Class is in session! For more edu-lols, head over at the brand new School of FAIL!
Submitted by: Unknown
-
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Beware Gay Mirages | Mommy’s Imaginary Friends Next »
« Previous Beware Gay Mirages | Mommy’s Imaginary Friends Next »
Class is in session! For more edu-lols, head over at the brand new School of FAIL!
Submitted by: Unknown
doods cray .. they right thogh, most whyte doods lyke dey beer n whiskey ,i aint never see no A on ne of MY papers though.. mark-ass trick teachers i had wuz prolly jealous of my writin style and creativity . i remember fïrst day fresmen year dude told us to write a cupple paragraphs tellin him a lil bit ab.out ourselves…. i turn it in, 5 mins l8er dude handed it back 2 me wit a F+
… i wuz lyke wow dude jealousy must consume all ur tyme u fukkin asswhole
wordy…
yeh 4real. dat dood wuz so fukkin twisted that he could prolly eat nails and shyt out corkscrews
Christ, I hope you’re Trolling.
dood im not sayin he WOULD eat tha nails, jus dat if he DID ,dey’d prolly come out tha other end as corkscrews ..man wuz crooked as a pitbulls back fukkin leg
yes
i mean thx lmao
nice troll
F+? does that even exist? XD
yuppes izzza toppe skoure inna mee papier wurkkes….
^ He gets it all the time in English class, the teacher just wants to be nice, hence the +
“Room for improvement.”
you are a walking, talking & typing (well, in a manner of speaking) advert for retrospective abortion.
O look errb.ody ,, a daywalker is talkin.. .now lets try n be nyce n not pick on it jus because of its hair color. cuz then we’d b jus as guilty of cruelty n unwarranted hatred, geeezzz
Your stupid and deserve F’s when you write like a inbred idiot.
take my stupid wit me in my pocket homie , next to da bag of DA DANKEST BUDS EVAR lol
*You’re
*Fs
*an
^this.
Do you even know how to spell properly or use proper grammar? Your writing is atrocious.
so are fukkin oreos witout milk ya doocheball
Poyint guddes….waytte duede 3…reates ovva de wurld 1….
???? wen tha wurld score on ya b.oy ? wurld aint got no D , cant beat fundamental whyte doods witout strong D-fence
Now I’m sure you are faking it.
I refuse to believe someone can correctly utilize and spell words like:
“declarative”, “adjectives”, “fundamental”, “unwarranted”, & “supremacist”
Yet cannot manage to correctly spell simple words like:
“when”, “time”, “that”, & “world”
Anallickitall brian youse hazza…
ni663r
dawg lets leave tha racism n tha 20th century ya biggot .. n numbers dont make ur racial bias ne more clever bro
plus, i mean…your name even says “whyte” XD
supremacist logic is supremeWhoever you are…whatever your mission may be…please know that I FULLY appreciate what you are doing here. Half of your comments have given me chills simply due to the underlying genius in each. I will continue to visit these comments strictly because of the entertainment value that is you. If you leave, please notify us (me) of your intentions and/or whereabouts. I mean it.
Sincerely,
Reason’s Voice
How u do a hart on here ??
dam
♥ bro lol
lol sorry, i meant the fact he’s using that term on you, assuming you are black (i think?) probably because the type of speech you’re using, yet your name has “whyte” in it. apologies, didn’t mean anything by it
lol naw chick i got it … i wuz sayin dat u wuz right .. dis supremacist dood is a idiot n shudda been able to clearly c dat im whyte.. i mean shyt , my name is fukkin whyte dood lol so yeh i agree wit u
i no dat man it says it were u put ur name at ya freakin wierdo ..
n how u gunna tell me i need 2 get better wit my wurdz and then kinda imply dat bye gettin better dat i actually need 2 do WORSE!?!?? lmao u confusin DA HELL out me guy lol
*F–
*F minus minus
*teem
declarative sentenses wit question marks adjectives no commas ur name says then not then
d.ickwad illiterate b.astard adult.
white is not spelled “whyte” dude is not “doods”, “Cray” is not Crazy, was is not “wuz” and Like is spelled with an I. If you call that creatividy please go to a mental institution or go try to graduate highschool. and om sorry but asswhole? are you really that dumb dude, Get Your Head Out of your ass.
well dat aint wut i call it playa. call it creativity .. n wen u dun chuggin on da haterade , maybe u cudd find sum1 to proofreed ur fukkin embarrassin attemps at correctin ppl ya dam degenerate . dam shyt gettin REAL AS HELL in dis joint lol sum1 pack tha dam flobee
*creativity,
go*high school
*And
*I’m or um
*Are
dude?
I’ll imagine the caps are a form of shouting.
Stepphanie youse musk nottes feaddes de trolloollol wiff such loww graides nommes…..
I like you.
What?
According to Wikipedia, this is the greatest thing ever posted on the internet, ever. TV Tropes disagrees.
Poll:
Please expand on your thesis below:
Thesis
T hes is
T h es i s
T h e s i s
T h e s i s
T h e s i s
T h e s i s
Lesson learned: use nsbp’s next time.
Lesson learned: use nspb’s next time.
I appreciate your efforts nonetheless…
Thesis SPARTA!!
…but you clearly won this Poll:
Hm. I’d have given C————- an F.
I’d say C—- was lucky he didn’t get brought up on academic misconduct charges. At my university, faculty are responsible for reporting that sort of thing to the Dean of Students.
It’s really a pity that the student didn’t learn that reporting when a hypothesis is NOT supported by the data is still a worthy research project.
From what I read his problem wasn’t that his hypothesis did not support the data, it was that he could not find research on his topic. The student showed creativity and intelligence that should be rewarded not punished.
Falsifying data is a serious breach of academic integrity and ethics.
And yes, technically he should be reported to the university authorities, but I’m too lazy to go through the process and it is easier to just fail them. Lots of professors have a policy of failing students that cheat, and then if the student challenges the grade reporting them.
nope academic dishonesty is not creativity and intelligence that should be rewarded
‘Support for’ could be interpreted that way, I suppose. I read it as ‘support FOR’ as opposed to against. So you think he just didn’t find any information about the topic? You think that’s really likely that a student could think up a topic that NO ONE has ever written about before?
And we should reward him for making up lies? The assignment wasn’t ‘creative writing’ it was ‘research paper’.
I highly doubt that. Contrary to popular belief, websites do not constitute a proper source for any research paper. The reason for this should be evident now. Only published peer-reviewed literature (and in very rare cases, unpublished work that is expected to be published soon) should be cited in a research paper.
Most likely, this was a high school assignment. Either that, or C’s professor should reevaluate his teaching methods.
No it shouldn’t.
So he paid to host reputable sounding websites and put work into writing full papers for each of them? I would say that’s more work than writing the paper based on legitimate facts.
No, I think he’s saying he just created likely-sounding citations and hoped the professor wouldn’t click on the links to see them.
That’s what I was thinking. Plus the fact that the teacher just had to google to see if there were any other websites out there that supported or talked about the guys hypothesis and when he didnt find any he could have become suspicious about the sites. A simple whois lookup would probably have given the student away. But then again we are talking about a tenured union teacher so he probably looked at the students paper for form and content and assumed the kid did actual research. The teacher should have failed the kid upon doing the second paper though just because he outright lied to the teacher and abused the trust that the teacher put in his students to use legitimate research for their theories.
Well, that’s going a bit far I think. The kid did show quite some ingenuity. remember, Kirk cheated to win.
I was surprised the professor didn’t fail the paper simply for using the internet as citation. Everyone knows you can’t believe what you read on the webs these days.
most research papers today allow the internet to be used as a source, never a citation. you actually have to cite the website you obtained the information off of. it’s much easier for students to access information this way, and sometimes it’s actually the best way TO access information, as books for the subject you’re researching are not always readily available. (dunno if you were kidding or not, but yeah XD)
No, most research papers allow students to use online, peer reviewed research articles. They usually don’t allow just any old web page.
‘just had to google’? Lordy, I wish I had time to google every website my students use…and I have a relatively low grading load. If you’ve got a couple of weeks to grade 100+ research projects and final exams, your time is pretty limited.Only way around that is to make the term paper due at midterms, and I don’t think the students would be happy about that.
The truly bizarre thing… and the thing that makes me seriously doubt the truth of the comment… is that professor accepted websites as citations in the first place.
Unless it is a well-known and peer-reviewed scholarly website, internet sites are not valid sources. The entire point of academia is that knowledge is earned–the point of the internet is everyone has a voice and insists on using it regardless of ignorance and stupidity.
This is true specifically for the reason expressed in the comment: anyone can put up a website. You want proof the Earth is flat? There’s a website for that. You want proof that (indicate racial group here) is genetically superior to all others? There’s a website for that. Pedophilia is normal and even healthy? Websites galore.
You can’t cite a newspaper or a popular magazine as evidence to back a point–just to further a discussion, typically as a concrete example of a viewpoint that you wish to discuss. Same thing applies to websites.
tl;dr
Any student clever enough to think this up would be clever enough to make up sites that sound scholarly…like hhs.gov or harvard.edu.
It is more work, sure, but manufacturing data is still a breach of academic ethics.
Sure is a lot of butthurt up in here.
And it seems a lot of people don’t recognize a troll when they see one. It’s sad and hilarious at the same time. But hey, it happens to the best of us.
hey Claripossum. How has you been. How was the trip? i hope you h ave been well.
Yeah, really, it’s more annoying that all these morans up there are replying to that troll than the troll himself…
Also, alcoholism is most prevalent among white males because other demographics are more likely to go for crack, obviously.
Actually, he was wrong about that fact. Alcoholism is most prevalent in Native Americans.
I never ever heard of dolphins getting drunk,
did you?
Everyone is missing the point with their criticisms grounded in acedemic ethics. He didn’t publish falsified academic material (which would constitute a breach of ethics), he ‘misled’ his teacher (which is the teachers bad not his anymore) with by forging the substance of the paper, but he demonstrated procedural excellence in his execution of the task, this is what his teacher realized and appreciated. Pending the task he might have legitimately aced it.
what about peer reviewed sources lol
Poor Roe Russo from Greensboro, AL.
Just proves that sociology is a load of s**t
haters gonna hate
*SUCK 301
I don’t know who posted this, but I know the guy who did the Bibliography paper.
Cool story, bro. However it is Native Americans who are more genetically predisposed to alcoholism. Certain nationalities of white men are prone to alcoholism (Scots, Irish), but that’s not all white people.
Jewish people are among the least likely to be alcoholics, genetically speaking. However, they are more likely to be opiate addicts.
Either I know the guy who posted the last comment or he stole it from here…. Probably the latter.
HOUSE OF LEAVES.
my friend did something similar but not as extensive.