Yes, no racism if there were no other races is one answer. There would also be no racists if there were not stupid people. Can we get rid of the stupids instead please?
For about ten minute i thought the censored “Black People” was a name, and didn’t get it at all. Then when I realized it I thought; “WHY THE FRIGGIN’ HECK ARE YOU CENSORING THIS PAGE ANYWAY!?”
>:-(
(Tried to write it with swear words but, meh, it wouldn’t show..)
What’s wrong with saying n!ggers? They call themselves n!ggers. If they can say it, then there is no reason for us not to be able to call them n!ggers.
Except for the whole “gaining back the power” thing, that was pretty funny.
If minorities can use the historically weighted negative words to give them power over implied criticism, then how come the “Priveledged” few using the same words are not technically harming them with the words?
There’s a fail in that logic. It’s called employing Psychological mumbo-jumbo to make excuses. You can’t cry “racism” and then make excuses to be a hypocrit.
The way I see it, there’s a distinct difference between black people and nadgers (see, I used it!). The major differences are that normal black people talk like they have a firm grasp of the English language, aren’t completely insane, don’t act like gangsters and don’t ruin neighborhoods.
Careful. By even SUGGESTING there’s a less then wholesome element to society will get you into all sorts of problems.
White trash. Asian thugs. Black drug dealers. Mexican gangsters. All of them share in many of the same issues and cause nothing but problems society has to clean up, while a few bleeding hearts chase the rest of us around filing lawsuits if we even suggest there’s a problem. You know, because wanting children of all races to grow up, get an education, and become a productive member of society rather than a welfare sponge raised on the streets is very intolerant and bigoted of me.
Redacting the word when it’s the whole freekin’ crux of the fail = FAIL. It would be nice if we were bright enough to distinguish between hurling epithets (BAD) and quoting them in order to discuss them, point out hypocrisy, etc (OK).
But that would require actual sanity on the Intertubez, so…
I haven’t read a single post by you that doesn’t read like it was written by an utterly self absorbed, desperate “wannabe know it all” (failing miserably BTW), misinformed and unfunny f*knut of an idiot…. are you really not aware that you come across as little more than a f**king tool?
I disagree. Obviously the redaction didn’t impede the understanding of the fail. Despite the fun many of us are having with the spelling of the word, we all understood what was under the censor bar.
…and then we’d start to get rid of the people bigger than “normal” (or maybe smaller, first- less dangerous), and then ugly people, red-haired ones,…
No. That wouldn’t work.
when you get rid of one thing people hate about each other, people will naturally find another reason to hate other people. be it religion, hair color, or shape/size. people just suck.
‘people just suck.’ wow. cheer up Charlie, I think we should take the problems we have now, fix them, and take whatever comes next as we see fit. It’s like eating an apple, might be brown with bruises on the outside, you cut off the bruises, continue eating but not care to think what the core will be like until you reach it.
…Until you realize the core is filled with arsenic! It wasn’t an apple at all, it was a time release capsule for poison! If only you had thought enough to realize that those bruises were a sign of what laid within.
^ Well-put, although I disagree about the skin color of the original people. Deterioration of pigmentation in genetics suggests that the first people most-likely had olive-toned skin, such is currently prevalent in the middle-east. But that’s beside the point. Good post.
Er…
PROTECT THE PARADOX! PROTECT THE PARADOX!!
^Wouldn’t be a loss to society.
^Wouldn’t be a loss to society.
^wouldn’t be a lo… C-C-COMBO BREAKERRRR
^pudding
^^ mmmmmhmm pudding *gurgles*
Monkey Face wouldn’t be a loss to society.
^Wouldn’t be a loss to society.
^Wouldn’t be a loss to society.
^Would be a loss to society.
PUDDI
…ng would be a loss to society.
Ahh
Did Chris Rock post this?
…I’m sorry I can’t add a clever comment here but: That’s funny
Watching Everybody hates Chris right now. lol
Guys, it’s a Doctor Who joke!
*sigh*
My bad, I guess.
Don’t worry, I got it lol
Thank you. Fish custard for you.
How is it Doctor Who?
Protect the paradox is DW.
“The spheres surrounding the Earth suddenly scream back to protect the paradox device and the Doctor yells at Jack to destroy it.” — ep 313.
… what
no paradox, you have to get rid of the N******, or else racists will keep coming back.
Yes, no racism if there were no other races is one answer. There would also be no racists if there were not stupid people. Can we get rid of the stupids instead please?
Yes, we should :I
An acceptable solution!
Right, let’s round up all the idiots we can find. I have written a standard that we can all adhere to when judging if someone is stupid or not.
Round them up and I’ll give you the standards.
i would like a chicken curry please with a topping of fries and maybe some extra spices please and make it snappy
I’ll have a poutine- neat -with extra curd, s’il vous plaît.
I love poutine!!
Alors que nous parlons français, je tiens à dire certaines choses français: Decreaux, Sourdeaux, Paris.
lol it’s actually ” j’ai bessoin de dire” or “je veux dire”
but other than that
plus ‘tenir’ is ‘to hold’ in french
not ‘to have’
“Je tiens à dire” is fine. It means something like “I wish to say”. But yeah, the main meaning of “tenir” is “to hold”.
*besoin
Anyone watched Nurnberg? :-S
^Nice one
I’m not a racist. I’m an equal oppurtunity hater. I hate everyone
Ahh, now *that* I can get in board with.
So, whilst I agree with you sir or madam, I hate you too.
That was original ……..
i hate you too
For about ten minute i thought the censored “Black People” was a name, and didn’t get it at all. Then when I realized it I thought; “WHY THE FRIGGIN’ HECK ARE YOU CENSORING THIS PAGE ANYWAY!?”
>:-(
(Tried to write it with swear words but, meh, it wouldn’t show..)
I don’t gett it? Neighbors and racists?
trying to get someone to say the word huh
Negus
What happens if you say it O_O
Ninjas is the more widely accepted connotation.
Only a ginger can call another ginger ‘ginger’.
i see what you did there
Do you want to know why people hate gingers? You can rearrange “ginger” to spell “n!gger”. That and they look weird. And they’re all Irish.
Or Scottish.
It’s like if you say “Beetlejuice” three times.
O hell, someone discovered my evil plan!
What’s wrong with saying n!ggers? They call themselves n!ggers. If they can say it, then there is no reason for us not to be able to call them n!ggers.
Oh student Skyman, You have gained Respect for that ever effective Troll You have just spoken
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#playfair
WIN! Thank you for this.
quite welcome
I have it bookmarked for just such occasions
Except for the whole “gaining back the power” thing, that was pretty funny.
If minorities can use the historically weighted negative words to give them power over implied criticism, then how come the “Priveledged” few using the same words are not technically harming them with the words?
There’s a fail in that logic. It’s called employing Psychological mumbo-jumbo to make excuses. You can’t cry “racism” and then make excuses to be a hypocrit.
Then again, I missed the whole purpose behind the scenes. Sheesh.
Oh man, this really is brilliant.
the nascars and racers.
^win
yes, neatly done, sir
Some people do use the ‘N’ word outside of racial context. They use it to describe extremely stupid people or criminals, regardless of race.
Thats what it actually means…
No. it actually isn’t. Do some research.
The “n-word” comes from the word Negro, which is latin for black. So N***** means black. I haven’t heard it in any other contexts.
N***** is a racist remark, though.
Do you pronounce that “N Starererererererer”?
…actually, yeah, what?
Oohhhh… naggers.
+88 Internetz
-87 for unoriginality. They did it on South Park.
*facepalm*
That’s the point.
*sigh*
I really hope that’s what it said… People who nag…
No, it says noggers, people who make egg nog.
Or just people who like to nog.
Apologise.
Apologize.
Apollo jizz.
Houston, we have a problem.
I was totally gonna put that!!
I agree, the world would be a better place without naggers and racists.
Niqgers.
Seems like I can’t say the N-word with Qs used as Gs.
Nadgers? Indeed, the world would be better off without those. However short the world would then be…
(Seriously, nobody had used nadgers yet?!)
MUSHROOM MUSHROOM
Sreggin.
Spell that backwards.
Taht.
Who*
tee aich ay tee space bee ay see kay double-you ay are dee ess period
eye space dee ess pee eye ess e space why o you period
You forgot an e
…with their pants SAGGIN… (spell THAT backwards).
^WIN
The way I see it, there’s a distinct difference between black people and nadgers (see, I used it!). The major differences are that normal black people talk like they have a firm grasp of the English language, aren’t completely insane, don’t act like gangsters and don’t ruin neighborhoods.
So, personally, I agree with the guy.
yup
Careful. By even SUGGESTING there’s a less then wholesome element to society will get you into all sorts of problems.
White trash. Asian thugs. Black drug dealers. Mexican gangsters. All of them share in many of the same issues and cause nothing but problems society has to clean up, while a few bleeding hearts chase the rest of us around filing lawsuits if we even suggest there’s a problem. You know, because wanting children of all races to grow up, get an education, and become a productive member of society rather than a welfare sponge raised on the streets is very intolerant and bigoted of me.
Me too! Are we bad people?
‘scuse? NORMAL? You’re not one who gets to judge what is and isn’t NORMAL.
Then who DOES get to judge what is and is not normal?
Most certainly not you, either, my friend.
You are a racist tool.
In other words, I believe that the successful Troll is successful, and I got a bit of a chuckle out of the pic.
the way he sees it is strangely similar to the way chris rock sees it. hes not so much a racist tool as an unoriginal tool
On the other hand:
Nigers? What’s wrong with that?
No, it’s Nigels.
Ugh… I don’t think I can write this here!
I don’t think I can reply here!
Redacting the word when it’s the whole freekin’ crux of the fail = FAIL. It would be nice if we were bright enough to distinguish between hurling epithets (BAD) and quoting them in order to discuss them, point out hypocrisy, etc (OK).
But that would require actual sanity on the Intertubez, so…
Why’s that? Do you wanna invite the KKK into the debate while you’re at it?
The KKK are master-debaters.
that could explain why they are covered in white I guess.
and cunning linguists
I haven’t read a single post by you that doesn’t read like it was written by an utterly self absorbed, desperate “wannabe know it all” (failing miserably BTW), misinformed and unfunny f*knut of an idiot…. are you really not aware that you come across as little more than a f**king tool?
I disagree. Obviously the redaction didn’t impede the understanding of the fail. Despite the fun many of us are having with the spelling of the word, we all understood what was under the censor bar.
Ninjers
I like me some ninjers. I fight em after I’m done wit them injuns…
Racism is awful. I reckon the best solution is to get rid of all races, bar one. Then everyone would be the same…
…and then we’d start to get rid of the people bigger than “normal” (or maybe smaller, first- less dangerous), and then ugly people, red-haired ones,…
No. That wouldn’t work.
being ugly or having red hair is not a race, it is a look. Therefore we would get rid of racisim.
when you get rid of one thing people hate about each other, people will naturally find another reason to hate other people. be it religion, hair color, or shape/size. people just suck.
‘people just suck.’ wow. cheer up Charlie, I think we should take the problems we have now, fix them, and take whatever comes next as we see fit. It’s like eating an apple, might be brown with bruises on the outside, you cut off the bruises, continue eating but not care to think what the core will be like until you reach it.
…Until you realize the core is filled with arsenic! It wasn’t an apple at all, it was a time release capsule for poison! If only you had thought enough to realize that those bruises were a sign of what laid within.
true true, how ever you would never of found out the real out come of that core untill you got to it. Another words life is just one big gamble.
Well, as Richard Pryor once put it after spending almost a month in Africa…
^ Well-put, although I disagree about the skin color of the original people. Deterioration of pigmentation in genetics suggests that the first people most-likely had olive-toned skin, such is currently prevalent in the middle-east. But that’s beside the point. Good post.
The racially intolerant… and the Dutch.
people who are intolerant of other people’s cultures – and the Dutch….
Christians and Muslims
So no one else immediately thought the guy was just being a smart-ass? Maybe I give people too much credit.
So what’s wrong with talking about Nabooans and Rancours?
Stupid Imperialists >:(
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/07/3/text_pop/l_073_04.html
There’s no paradox if you lose the stupid canard that black people can’t possibly be racist.
Try being asian or hispanic in L.A. sometime.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-JIjEsLkDA&w=640&h=390