Failbook - Funny Facebook Status Messages

 

« Previous | Next »


Another Victim of The Scientific Method

Another Victim of The Scientific Method

Submitted by: Unknown

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

You May Like:

» See all 154 comments

  1. B.F. Skinner says:

    nb4 the heck.

  2. santa claus says:

    This makes me sad…. :(

    • winter says:

      im going to have a party on New Years for my web show call!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE SNOWY SHOW all of u are invited To my party for my web show watch it on fail blog,kids bop,and were im broad casting my own home to be invited to my party.It is all happenig on New Years Evev all of u are invited remeber watch it at any of those web sites.At 6:20 on the dot i would of watched it on kids bop im just sayn call me at well ya dot see ya -_-

    • Joseph says:

      I know… That poor person. Why wouldnt she get away from the microwave.. that thing was pumping out radiation…

  3. Duh says:

    The poor microwave -_-

  4. God says:

    I’m sorry, she was a mistake.

  5. G Man says:

    The real test here was if they were stupid enough to try it. Guess who failed the test!

    • God says:

      You, trying to be funny ?

    • Xenobio says:

      My guess is that what was intended was, “Put your phone in the microwave (without turning on the microwave), call it, and see if it rings”. (which *may* make sense depending on what wavelengths of radiation the microwave can block) The OP thought it was “Put your phone in the microwave, turn on the microwave, and see if it rings.”

      • humbert says:

        I think the simpler explanation is that she was trolled irl.

      • :D says:

        Both cell phones and microwave ovens emit radiation at 2.4ghz. So yea that’s basically right. Your microwave should not allow any radiation at 2.4ghz to be transmitted from the inside to the outside and vice versa. The person didn’t get trolled in real life they were just stupid and didn’t understand.

        • tahrey says:

          Except cellphones DON’T emit radiation at 2.4Ghz. Do your research next time. 850, 900, 1800 and 1900Mhz usually, with 2100Mhz as an option on the 5-band ones.

          If your phone has bluetooth and/or wifi, and they’re turned on, then it’s transceiving on 2.4Ghz, but you don’t use those to make calls.

          However the experiment still has some worth. Radiation shielding is rarely tuned to a single frequency or narrow band (unless it’s e.g. an optical filter), so if it filters out 0.85 ~ 2.1Ghz, it’s *probably* (though not explicitly) doing well at 2.4Ghz, and vice-versa.

          There’s a whole load of absolute horse-s**t talked about microwave emissions, their field strength, the effects of such and how to detect them though, so I’d take any statement about it not qualified by two or more years of PhD research at a state-funded university with a bucket of sodium chloride.

        • tahrey says:

          Except cellphones DON’T emit radiation at 2.4Ghz. Do your research next time. 850, 900, 1800 and 1900Mhz usually, with 2100Mhz as an option on the 5-band ones.

          If your phone has bluetooth and/or wifi, and they’re turned on, then it’s transceiving on 2.4Ghz, but you don’t use those to make calls.

          However the experiment still has some worth. Radiation shielding is rarely tuned to a single frequency or narrow band (unless it’s e.g. an optical filter), so if it filters out 0.85 ~ 2.1Ghz, it’s *probably* (though not explicitly) doing well at 2.4Ghz, and vice-versa.

          There’s a whole load of absolute horse-puckey talked about microwave emissions, their field strength, the effects of such and how to detect them though, so I’d take any statement about it not qualified by two or more years of PhD research at a state-funded university with a bucket of sodium chloride.

        • Boosterseat says:

          If cell phones and microwaves emitted the same ammount of radiation, you’d be cooking your freaking head each time you called someone.

          • Siirenias says:

            Say that radiation were exercise weights. The rate at which you can repeat the exercise is the frequency. The mass of the weight would, I think, be the amperage. I’m sure it isn’t, but the same concept applies.

            Frequency does not inherently imply how powerful the dose is.

  6. Smart says:

    mx+b=fail

  7. Joker says:

    That goes to the book of 101 blonde jokes

  8. CandyPants says:

    Hopefully they don’t try that with their cat

  9. Leader Desslok says:

    I need closure so did it ring or not?

  10. Ironica says:

    This person knows better than to look in the dictionary for the word “gullible,” because they know it’s not there.

  11. x_x says:

    It actually makes perfect sense if you think about it, the phone wouldn’t ring if the microwave oven’s shielding kept all radiation from getting in or out; all you have to do is to put the phone in, close the door, and try calling it; BUT WHY THE HECK WOULD YOU TURN THE MICROWAVE ON?!?

    JEEZUZ ROLLERBLADING CHRIST!

    • Duh says:

      Nice, are we the only two people on here who understand this? This is sadening…

    • Sweet says:

      It does make perfect sense for testing the microwave for leaks.

      • Rezer says:

        Not really, cell phones and microwaves don’t use the same wavelengths. It would be like assuming something is waterproof just because it it holds gravel without any problems

        • james says:

          A better test would be to transmit a signal over wifi since 802.11 operates on the same 2.4 GHz band that the microwave operates on. So, open skype and try to skype the phone, then you would know.

        • james says:

          Also, most cell signals are in the range 800MHz -> 1.9GHz, so the analogy is more like assuming something is waterproof because it holds cooking oil.

          • Rezer says:

            Well yeah, but that makes for a rather bad analogy and isn’t nearly as easy to visualize! Point’s still valid, dammit! ;p

    • harmony says:

      But… a phone signal isn’t radiation.

      • Locnar says:

        Ah, yes it is. I just isn’t microwave radiation. Light is radiation, it is just in the visible spectrum. A phone signal is in the radio spectrum.

        • sas says:

          Yes it is, it is in the microwave range. So does bluetooth, wifi, UHF television (the second dial) if you’re old enough to remember that, and many other uses.

          • Outback Jon says:

            UHF isn’t considered microwave, it’s considered, uh, Ultra High Frequency.

            Bluetooth, WiFi, and most of the currently used cell phone frequencies are, however.

            • Brian-M says:

              There are a couple of different definitions for “microwaves”, but one commonly used definition has microwaves starting at 1GHz, well within the UHF range (and cell-phone range).

              The other commonly used definition of microwaves has microwaves starting at 3GHz, where the SHF range begins. But if you use *that* definition, then a microwave oven doesn’t actually use microwaves at all.

              Don’t tell anyone, but microwave ovens actually operate in the UHF range. Maybe they should be called UHF ovens instead?

              • tahrey says:

                As in “millimetre waves”, I suppose (1mm wavelength = approx 3Ghz). But does that band extend upwards to 1cm (300Mhz, or somewhere between VHF and UHF), or down to the micrometer range (300Ghz or so)? I would suspect the latter, given the “microwave” label…

                All the same, 2.4 isn’t very far from 3.0, and you could make a case for 1.8 (not sure about 0.85 though). They’re all roughly in the same zone.

      • Justice says:

        It is, just not harmful (or as harmful, the jury is out) as you would find in high level radioactive output like an x-ray, the sun, or playing hackeysack with a hunk of uranium.

        Technically, any light can be considered radiation.

        • Agent 1024 says:

          You know, the first thing I would worry about playing hackey sack with uranium is my foot, which will be broken from playing with such a heavy footbag, not the radiation.

  12. Definiendum says:

    I don’t think the teller said something about turning the microwave on.

    • Phantom Fan says:

      I believe that was implied when they said their phone blew up.

    • Sweet says:

      The person who told Demi how to test her microwave for leaks most likely understood the basic science behind the directions.

      They never would have said to “turn on the microwave” but omitted the “call your own phone and see if it rings” part of the directions, believing that portion was understood.

      Massive fail. Palm to forehead.

  13. person says:

    Volunteers needed for a scientific study: Investigating whether or not people can distinguish between scientific studies and kidney harvesting scams.

  14. Giggles says:

    OMFG… O.o this is all I have to say to this.

  15. zombie says:

    i was going to microwave my phone, but then i had to the heck

  16. teh d00che says:

    “if i doesn’t ring” hihihihihi

  17. Crispy-chan says:

    … Because common sense never told you it’s a bad idea to microwave a phone.

  18. alicia says:

    im so freaking confused… so what would happen if i put my phone in the microwave and called it without turning the microwave on?

    and why would you put a phone in the microwave and turn it on anyway?

    • tor2ga says:

      They get better reception if you leave them in the micro for about 30 seconds…makes the sound nice and crisp.

    • Xenobio says:

      Explanation for non scientists: Microwaves are a type of radiation that’s somewhat close to cell phone signals. Microwave ovens are designed to stop the microwaves from getting out (for obvious reasons). So, if you put your phone in the microwave oven and call it and it rings, that means the cell signal is getting through, which means your microwave oven is leaky. And no, you DON’T turn the microwave oven on while doing this.

  19. Growing a face palm says:

    Some people should be slapped…
    …to death…
    …with a cell phone…
    …and a microwave!

  20. maddi says:

    another way to destroy phone through science. she used radiation used from microwaves, i use gravity, a back pants pocket, and the need to pee.

  21. Sam says:

    I WANT to believe that this is real. So i will.

  22. meh says:

    So…it didn’t ring? The phone was fine then?

  23. Zack says:

    BAHAHAHAHAHAHA. HAHa ha. haha. holy cow. that dude is an idiot. wow. epic. lol.

  24. subtletrollissubtle says:

    is it a good idea to microwave this?

  25. RWW says:

    Somebody seriously misunderstood some advice like the following:

    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_you_check_for_a_radiation_leak_in_a_microwave

  26. Nazi says:

    Don’t feel too bad. Francis Bacon, the guy who invented the scientific method, did an experiment to see if meat would be preserved in snow. Turns out snow can preserve meat, and can also cause fatal pneumonia.

    • Xenobio says:

      Actually the jury’s still out on whether being cold makes you sick or not. The answer turns out to be “it depends” on a whole bunch of other variables. In Bacon’s case obviously the stars lined up right (or wrong).

      • humbert says:

        I thought that being cold just lowers your defenses and makes it easier for pathogens to attack your body, but that being cold in and of itself doesn’t make you sick.

        • tahrey says:

          i’d posit that breathing so much icy-cold, damp air probably did a number on his lungs (and cilia, and…), and left those delicate mucous membranes highly susceptible to infection (that and all the raw meat). they’re not really cut out for such treatment. your caveman instincts tell you to Go The F*** Home And Cower Amongst Blankets rather than pratting about in the snow for a good reason…

  27. Catflap says:

    My mobile rings when I put it in the microwave – and call it from a landline.

  28. Marek says:

    I think the idea behind it is that a closed microwave is supposed to form a faraday cage. If your phone can recieve calls while in the closed microwave, then the cage is not complete and RF radiation can escape the oven.

    However there’s plenty of other variables that could block cell phone reception, so it’s not too accurate. But at least if it rings, you know you should get it checked out.

  29. Blazey says:

    In Soviet Russia the heck needs to you.

  30. I Am Jack's Colon says:

    EPIC WIN for those no longer living under the threat of having to speak with Demi.

  31. cwolf says:

    Well, to my understanding, a microwave is a Faraday cage (no electricity/radio waves/etc. in or out). If you put your cell phone in there and call it, and it doesn’t ring, you know that no microwaves are escaping and you’re safe. If the call goes through and rings, that’s not a good sign.

    Thing is, you don’t turn the microwave on during this process. That should be obvious.

    • RomanFox says:

      I work in tech support for a wireless carrier, and sometimes we do tell people to put their phone in the microwave for a few minutes, so that it can completely disconnect itself from the network and reacquire a new registration when removed from the microwave. Of course, we actually tell the people, “this is very important: do NOT turn on the microwave!”

      • tahrey says:

        Really? Never heard that one before.

        Turning it fully off and waiting five minutes before powering back on, sure… maybe even removing the battery, if it’s not some overly poncy smartphone that doesn’t let you do that.

        And a regular oven, if it’s all-metal inside at least, should do a similar job – and be far less risky even if they turn it on! Or just wrapping it in tinfoil!

  32. asdf says:

    bulls**t, I just tried it and it doesn’t work. My phone rang while the microwave was on, and it didn’t explode. I had it in there for 5 minutes just to test it out.

    I call BS

  33. Mercy says:

    Wow… and people wonder why I have no faith in humanity.

  34. axel ingleson says:

    And I finally know now why cellphone manuals have a warning in them that says “do not place in microwave.”

  35. aeiour says:

    why the hell are there so many comments?! this is a humor website ,NOT A SCIENCE SITE!

  36. Doctor Turdmidget says:

    I test hamsters this way.

  37. adasdad says:

    i think insteade of putting ur phone in the microwave and turning it on, u take a phone, put in microwave, call the phone, if it rings, ur microwave leaks radiation, cuz if the cell phone waves got in, radiation can come out.

  38. Ford says:

    Damn, Darwin, you were THIS close to claiming another victim!

  39. KBurchfiel says:

    I’ve had my cell signal get fuzzy when I was standing in front of an operating microwave. (Our TV also emitted noise.) I guess that’s one way to see if your microwave is emitting radiation.

  40. tahrey says:

    One more vote for the “put it in the microwave” =/= “microwave it” camp… Though, let’s count this as a blessing. Anyone that stupid shouldn’t be allowed a phone anyway (or a microwave – with any luck, the resulting lightning storm burnt it out as well)

  41. tahrey says:

    (aaaaaaaaaand, as no-one else seems to have said it yet)

    BUT WHO WAS PHONE?

  42. xenodox says:

    looks like you shouldn’t get your phone from Doc Brown, then. Mr. Fusion doesn’t like microwaves.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s