![Court in Session [WIN]](http://cheezfailbooking.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/5381a054-6ad5-43ee-a4e1-6105073ca083.jpg "Funny Facebook Fails - Court in Session [WIN]")
Submitted by: Unknown
FYI, if you TL;DR this one, you lose.
-
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous WARNING! Free iPhone Worm is Spreading on Facebook | Maybe That’s Why Next »
« Previous WARNING! Free iPhone Worm is Spreading on Facebook | Maybe That’s Why Next »
Submitted by: Unknown
FYI, if you TL;DR this one, you lose.
Too much ready, probably not that funny anyway.
Your loss, I found this to be the best one I’ve seen yet
True, this made my day…
Made my day too.
Yeah it was definitely up there.
Exactly!
Holy damn that was an awesome read!
I’d like to go out drinking with Red Guy. Sounds like he’d be a quick wit and a lot of fun.
I agree, this was hilarious.
Oh my that WAS funny. And there’s a pic, so it happened!
No, theres no pic.
Both of them were fail.
Red PWNZ!
HIGH-larious!
I actually *DID* LOL!
Punchline WIN!!
No-one cares. Now STFU AND GTFO TO MAKE ME A TASTY SAMMICH.
Aww…reading is SO hard, isn’t it Pilotgirl?
Fave one i can remember.
This was really stupid. it was tottaly tl;dr
Aww! Its okay, Terrible Knitter! A lot of people have ADD and can’t—I’m gonna go chase a butterfly!
why are you on failbook and not in the kitchen pilotgirl?
this is the epicest win i have seen since Mike cat
I would have liked to see the rest of the “case” they stated. XD
Ptrin v. BUNNYTRICKS, 2004 metafilter.com/32666
Intarwebs: Court of Appeals, 2nd Appellate Dist. 2004
Wherein user ptrin invoked pics or it didn’t happen.
User bunnytricks could not delivar.
Teh internets ruled in favor of ptrin.
He’s good xD
yus it’s his job cause hes mah lawyerz.
Thats pretty f**king hysterical. XD
That is hilarious!
…
Scarlet dude honestly made me lmao. FUNNY GUY RIGHT THERE. Pink just irritated me by playing the feminist defense card and by being a bimbo. A right to what? It’s a RULE. You don’t have the right to “no cheating on the test.” Go flirt on myspace.
Exactly!
I concur.
I find support for feminism hilarious. It’s an ideology which is defeated by 10 seconds of critical thought, which means that it’s supporters simply just don’t think about what they support.
Premise of feminism: Men and women are equal.
Obvious counterpoint: Men cannot get pregnant, ergo men and women cannot be equal.
10 seconds, the fundamental premise of feminism defeated.
unless of course you take 10 more seconds to realise “equal” has more than one “obvious” definition.
oh shi–, “all men are created equal” is disproved by fingerprints, nooooo
Who said that I believe all men were created equal either?
Again, 10 second rule: I’m sure that kid who was born blind, deaf, and without legs has an “equal” chance to become an NFL player.
Equal Rights… Great job pointing out that not everybody is the same tho.
No. Men and women don’t have equal rights (even within the USA).
Even different races of men don’t have equal rights (within the USA).
Some people would even contest that rich people have more rights than poor people.
I find it ironic that the 20-25 year old, healthy, white, middle class male has the fewest opportunities available to him. Not priveledged, and without any minority card to play (including economic) this person has the least options when attempting to go to college (since there are vastly more scholarships available to so- called minority groups and women) and the government will refuse to help this person significantly because that person is expected to have help with the costs of their tuition from their parents.
Student loans for this person are, financially, a trap that will suck your pocketbook dry (especially now, considering that the government took control over all student loans as an addition to the healthcare bill) for ten to forty years.
No, the person I weep for is this unfortunate soul, who has no advantage even when applying for minimum wage jobs, not because he won’t work for less, but because the government subsidizes buisnesses that hire ex- criminals, retirees and people of a racial minority. Both Mc Donald’s and Taco Bell are perfect examples of this practice, in addition to most other fast food resturants.
If anything, the person with the fewest opportunities has the fewest so- called ‘rights’ to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
TL;DR
So since we can give birth, we’re better than you?
Well, we knew that….
=.=
assumptions dont make you look good…
Well if the goal is increasing population, then yes women are more valuable than men.
But if your goal is a well-functioning an long-term successful society, the more desired gender tips in the other direction. Civilization was built by men being men (admittedly doing it to seek women.)
Simple fact is, men are men and women are women. They are not equal nor interchangeable. Trying to base our society on the lie that is Feminism will bring us nothing but our own self-destruction.
Actually, if you measure value by an individuals ability to increase the population men would be more valuable than women. After all, a woman can only make one baby (assuming a normal pregnancy and not multiples) in nine months, but a single man could make at least a few hundred.
Good point. And probably a lot more than that, if he could find enough willing participants.
won’t that mean the women are much more precious?
A single man could spontaneously generate a few hundred babies? That’s impressive.
History was also written by men, so what’s your proof that women didn’t contribute more than is believed?
In the time it takes for a woman to gestate a man could impregnate hundreds of other women.
As for the how much women contributed to history, that’s irrelevant to the subject matter here. Also, to clarify, this is a joke and I am female.
And the women are required in order to make that logic work. Besides which the history thing wasn’t directed at you.
Actually, I think the main consideration when considering rebuilding a population would be… how do I say this? supply and demand? If you’ve got a tone of women and only one man, that make the man more ‘valuable’ but if it’s the other way around then women are more ‘valuable.’
Oh yeah the fail was funny too. XD
By that logic men are still more valuable than women. There are more women in the world than men.
Um… No.
The factor in reproduction rates is the number of available women. If you have 10 men and 100 women, you have 100 babies. If you have 100 men and 100 women, you have 100 babies. If you have 10000 men and 100 women, you have 100 babies.
You don’t get to 101 or 99 until the number of women change. Because those women are the limiting factor, they are more valuable.
Again, if value is measured by amount of offspring produced men have more value. One man can produce more babies in nine months than one woman. It’s a very simple concept.
Tell you what. We’ll have a competition.
My tribe will have 100 women and 10 men.
Your tribe will have 1,000 men and 10 women.. I’ll even give you almost 10x the people to start with.
In 100 years, we’ll see which tribe has the larger population.
If that doesn’t get you to understand the concept, I really don’t know what will.
You aren’t grasping the concept. In nine months one woman can produce one child whereas one man could produce 280 if he impregnates one woman per day.
So, in other words, yer just refusing to get the concept that the limiting factor in reproduction is the number of women available which makes women more important than men for the desired goal of increasing population.
Or, possibly, an idiot.
Or, possibly, trolling.
In any of those cases, you’re beyond my ability to help you. Therefore, it’s a waste of my time to continue to attempt to educate you.
You’re the idiot. The point is, in a lifetime a man can make more babies than a woman. You’re also an idiot for taking failbook comments so seriously.
Ok, I get the issue now.
You’re looking at reproduction in an individual context.
Unfortunately, reproduction does not exist in an individual context. Reproduction only exists as a group dynamic.
Point to Demonspawn.
omg
women and men coexist and mutually self-determine; their value is equal
their approximate value may vary from time to time; their absolute value does not
it doesn’t mean we’re identical tho; that is where feminism fails
Case closed, next witness
yes, but he couldn’t make any at all without women.
everyone comes from both man and woman. men can’t give birth, but neither can a woman without the help of man. so were all equal!
plus, I thought we were past all this sexist stuff. are people seriously so stupid and stubborn that they will not stop until one is proven to be better than the other? why can’t we just say that men are no better than women, and women are no better than men and get over it? people are overly competitive.
Simple fact is, the idea of what constitutes “man” and “woman” are built around cultural notions of what is “masculine” and what is “feminine”. Feminism is a theory that attempts to break down the polarizing genders that have come to define people and that media continuously reinforces.
It’s hard for me to believe that education and intelligent thought – regardless of what your position on the issues might be – will be what destroys us. Actually, in my opinion, I feel that when we force people to define themselves by their genitals that we risk losing more than is to be gained by hyper-masculinity and submissive females. Think of all the men that could have made amazing, caring teachers or loving fathers or whose gentle personality and sense of compassion would have saved so many lives. Think of all the strong, smart women who would have never gone into science fields or turned down being the leader of a research team to be a stay at home mother. Don’t you think that society would run best if people did what they were good at rather than what we pressured them to do just because of gender roles?
Note. Its sex, not gender. Gender is mental, sex is physical.
There’s a difference between defining two things as “equal” and saying something is “better” than the other.
Pears and raspberries are both awesome and make me so happy but that doesn’t mean they’re equal. Raspberries don’t go quite as well with blue cheese and pears make a s**t compote. The idea behind feminism is that women can do everything men can do and vice-versa, as such they all deserve equal opportunities at the same ventures. But in practice that just doesn’t work; the best female athlete in the world will never be as good as the best male athlete, a man will never be able to give birth; men get to grow rad facial hair, and women can hit the highest notes in the opera.
Obviously that is just the way things are and so the fundamental concept of feminism is, unfortunately, flawed. The spirit of it, however, is that both men and women are powerful, competent individuals and can’t be defined by their gender alone. And that is true.
So the problem with ol’ Pinky is that she doesn’t get that Red is just trying to be funny (and succeeding). She comes across looking stupid because she doesn’t get the joke, not because she’s a woman or a feminist.
You can totally TL;DR this comment of mine, my friends.
TL;DR hehe…
Have you ever studied feminist theory in any real way? The idea behind feminism is that we often uphold certain qualities as being masculine, and our culture is designed to value those qualities more. Women are nurses and men are doctors, and of course doctors are de facto more important and intelligent and prestigious. Men make good math teachers while women stick to English class and we all know math takes more brains and is more important. Men are stronger and raw strength is a desirable, positive ability.
It isn’t about a women being able to out preform a man, it’s about how we view working outside the home as being more difficult and better than being a stay at home parent, and then we divide the work between the sexes so that if a woman wants to have children she has to be willing to make career sacrifices while a man is not under those same expectations.
no just cause you can give birth means we have a right to f**k ur brains out
Looks like somebody finished one year of community college…
Women are not inferior to men (overall)
Men are not inferior to women (overall)
Both have areas where they are superior to the other. I just use pregnancy as the example that they are different because it is obvious and undebatable.
I think you have misunderstood feminism. That is entirely understandable, of course. Most people do not feel the need to read up on the critical approach to feminism. It takes time, not too mention it’s a very subjective field which means that – generally speaking – it takes a lot more willingness and intelligence than a subject that relies solely on root memorization.
At the core of most feminist thought is that the subjugation of women is wrong. I think most rational people would agree to this, but then everyone is allotted their own opinion on the matter. Now, different theorist have different views on how deep this discrimination goes and to ratify the situation but I think that the most popular tenets would be:
I. Women and men should be legally equal. This does not mean that women and men are identical (as you pointed out, there are differences) but that the law should not discriminate against women because of their sex/gender.
Example: Women and men should be granted the same rights and access to divorce, as oppose to cases where only men were allowed to challenge a marriage and women had no legal rights after marrying.
II. Even in situations where women are allowed the same legal protections as men, there is still an inequality of cultural and social approach towards sex/gender. Ideally, we should work to create a system where women and men are viewed on more equal terms.
Example: Culturally speaking, women’s virginity is still seen as an important part of her identity and crucial to how she is presented in the media, while men are not subject to these same expectations. This has nothing to do with physical differences, it it a matter of how society projects it’s values on individuals.
III. The subjugation of women is based on a binary view of sex and gender in which qualities perceived as masculine are given greater worth than those commonly seen as feminine. This creates strict gender roles that either sex is punished for deviating from.
Example: While this one is rooted heavily in misogyny, I personally feel that in present day it has a much bigger impact on men. The idea that qualities that are “feminine” are somehow less important or undesirable is clearly steeped in misogynistic attitudes, HOWEVER, in practice this means that women who display “masculine” identities are not perceived as negatively as men who act in some manner labeled “feminine”. Because these qualities are associated with the gendered idea of women, they are less valued (the weaker sex and all that) and therefore, men who act in such a way are more open to ridicule. This is why tomboys are acceptable but there is no male equivalent.
That’s right. In common feminist thought we recognize that the gender divide hurts EVERYONE, even men. Because it does.
IV: Society should allow individuals to act as they see fit instead of imposing upon them restrictions based on sex. See, that’s what we mean by equality. It isn’t about making men pregnant, it’s about allowing men to be nurses without degrading them with titles like “male nurse” which are meant to bring attention to how he is in a female field. It is about educating people so that the media stops teaching young girls that their main goal should be attracting men, it’s about erasing the image of women as objects and men as unemotional beer drinking Neanderthals that can’t even work a vacuum to save their lives because ‘Real Men Can’t Clean’.
Now I know all that takes a lot more than 10 seconds to process, but that’s okay! Sometimes, it’s alright to use your brain and think things through using intelligence and reason, and a lot of the time this will take some time – minutes even!
What is said in your post, Mina, is very good, but there is one minor issue I have with it: the majority of the modern proponents of feminism (probably the outspoken, radical minority, but they are the people the world, as a whole, sees) are no longer looking for equality of the sexes, they’ve taken it further: they want to prove that the female is better than the male. I’m sorry if this is not your viewpoint, it’s just one I’ve seen commonly expressed.
In my humble, uneducated opinion, this is a ridiculous stance to have. Women and men have different strengths and weaknesses- that is why they fit together so well (and I do mean physically, mentally, and emotionally) neither is better than the other, just different. This, coincidentally, is the biblical view on this matter as well.
I’ve often used this reply when discussing “modern feminism”
1. Name any government-granted right which men have which women do not have in equal or greater measure.
2. Name any government-enforced burden which women endure which men do not in equal or greater measure.
Turn the gender in those questions around and you’ll find tons of answers, just FYI.
But since there is nothing in the list, then why must feminism turn to government for a redress of grievances? Well, there’s only two possibilities:
A. Women are not equal to men and need government’s assistance to be equal.
B. Women are equal to men, but feminists are seeking a system of female supremacy.
So, in other words, either feminism is a lie or feminism is a hate-movement. If you think men and women are not equal, you recognize it as a lie. If you feel men and women are equal, then you must recognize feminism as the KKK with boobs.
“Well what about social values?” Well, reality dictates that women make up 52% of the population… which means, again, either women are equal and seeking government help to be superior, or women are inferior and need government help in shifting society (apparently unjustly) to see women as equal.
Ugh again. Its sex not gender. Seriously, gender is mental sex is physical.
mina-
You’re presenting a thoughtful reply, which I’ll give you credit for. However, it’s lacking in a dose of reality. That’s my main beef with feminism. You present ideas that “sound” good without being good.
I) Men and women CANNOT be legally equal. It’s not a question of should, it’s a question of can. Women had greater social worth, stemming from the issue that women make babies and men don’t. This is why we see men as more disposable than women, why we use men for warfare, why we don’t cringe over men in deadly jobs, etc.
Given that differing social value, if we give men and women equal legal rights, then both groups will protect women much more than they protect men. The legal equality quickly becomes legal superiority (which we have today). The only way to prevent legal equality from becoming female legal superiority is to make everyone hermaphrodites so that one gender is not more disposable than the other… well, really to make just one gender.
II) Men and women are treated differently because, well, they are different.
A society which allows it’s women to shun traditional roles dies a slow death. We can see that already in today’s society as our women are choosing careers over children and not reproducing above replacement rates. Eventually our culture will die out from not having enough offspring.
A society which allows it’s men to shun traditional roles commits instant suicide. A nation without men to secure the borders dies. A nation without men risking their lives in the dangerous and hard jobs doesn’t feed itself and starves.
As for your example, what you don’t recognize is that a woman’s virginity (or, at least, non-sluttyness) IS her value. As a man wants to get married, he wants to ensure that the children are his rather than the pool-boys. However, you ignore the reverse that a man is judged in a relationship by his wealth while women are not. This, again, is because of traditional gender roles and the value that he brings to the marriage (supporting the children).
III) The subjugation of men, you mean? You are correct that we allow women to seek out and fill the male gender roles while denying men the freedom to seek out female gender roles. As for why, refer to point II. It’s not that feminine is devalued (we have no problem with feminine women and traditionally have given praises to the work women do) it’s that men are restricted from the the female role because only women are allowed the privilege of having someone else be the earner for them.
In fact, if you look at any culture at any period of time (even in the middle east today) you will find that the average woman has a better life (longer life expectancy, less suicide) than the average man. Yes, yes, I know that women in those countries have to wear a burqa, but the young boys have to wear a rifle… and use it to protect those women from outsiders.
IV) Society should do X because “it’s fair”? No, it shouldn’t. Society IS dealing with reality and doing the things it needs to do to survive. This goes back to the “Is-ought” problem. People who talk about ought while ignoring is will end up dealing with the fact that is is while ought is a pipe dream.
We SHOULD teach men to control their emotions… As long as we have to deal with the IS of people who want to invade us and take us over.
We SHOULD teach girls to attract men… As long as we have to deal with the IS of needing men to work hard jobs producing much more than they alone need to drive society forward.
We SHOULD belittle men for taking easy jobs… As long as we have to deal with the IS I just described.
Basically, feminism wants us to act as if we lived in some utopia that not only doesn’t exist, but can’t exist due to the biological differences between the genders.
tl;dr
Thank you. This is a non-confrontational, very well worded version of the thoughts in my head. When I have children ( I am a little young currently ) I will want to stop working for a few years in order to raise them in a way that will make them flourish in our society. To be able to do that I need a man who can provide for me while that process is happening.
Do I want him to help with the kids and be an important part of their life? Yes!
Do I want some help around the house sometimes when I have been up all night with a crying baby? Yes!
But do I recognize that our roles as a woman and a man will be different, however equally important? Also Yes!
If I have a daughter, I will not teach her that she needs to look or act a certain way so that a man will like her, but society will. If that was not what society taught us then yes, I would probably instill that lesson in her. Does she need to wear a size zero? No. Or so much makeup you cannot see her face. No, but sometimes as women we do things purely to attract men. But men do the same thing!! You have seen men working out at the gym, they are trying to attract a woman. Now, another important point in this argument. Should a woman have sex because a man wants her to…. an age old argument. I will openly admit that I have done things with guys when I did not really want to because I felt pressured, and women draw the short stick with this one because men will never be left with a “little accident” 9 months later. I have made up my mind never to have sex with a man who would not help me (raising a baby, getting an abortion, doing an adoption) if this occurred. But if a man like that wants to have sex, with protection if I and/or he wished, then there is a good chance I would give in purely do to the fact that what makes a person dear to me happy, makes me happy. (most of the time!) Women who withhold sex just for a powertrip (NOT because of pain, real time constants, ect) are not the kind of people I would like to be friends with. Ok 2 cents added.
Again I’ll say it. It is sex, not gender. Sex=physical gender=mental.
I am female, that is my sex yet my gender can be male.
very good, your arguing style is to be applauded. Keep going. Equality is all I’ve ever wanted, and just like a relationship where there must be give and take which both sexes, I wished so much that others would practice this outside of relationships.
Do you know how many chivalrous men you can make happy simply by refusing to walk inside with the door open, allowing them to go first? Or saying thanks? I can’t tell you how good it feels. I know so others that would simply walk all over that. I think it’s best to judge others by their personality. After all, isn’t that what we do on the internet? (Until the gender/name becomes outspoken… )
TL;DR
^ That’s for you Canaduck
Classic! He BUTCHERED her!
LMAO! Oh my god that was hilarious XD
tl;dr
Your loss;it’s hilarious
doubt it , if its tl;dr cant be funny
How would you know? If you don’t read tl;dr things, then how would you know if they’re funny or not?
Unless people who say tl;dr actually DO read it, then conclude it to be unfunny, then post tl;dr.
so…I went back and read it…still too long and dumb
and I think all the people who are saying that it’s “hilarious” just want us to waste their time like they did
still not funny…boring
YES it worked! Hey guys, I got him to waste part of his life!
^ WIN!!
Funneh pic, funneh argument!
High-five!
^ Teh goal of every woman… To waste a mans life in pointless arguements, just so they are seen as “Intellectuals”
Oh, because your definition of “funny” is universal, now?
FWIW, I didn’t find it too funny, but I can see how others would. There’s this thing called personal taste. Not everyone finds the same things funny or unfunny.
too bad ; missed good joke
stfu & gtfo
you’re cool…
phishin’ for atheists…
lol look, it’s someone off the internet being “Funny”.
lol it’s funny because it’s like a thread off a certain board.
So original. LOL. ¬_¬
This was annoying and dumb. “Pics of it didn’t happen” is old and it was never cool to begin with.
I agree. People need to not say “pics or it didn’t happen”. It makes red seem like a smug *sshole
pics of it never being cool or it never happened
Win!
I agree with the Win!
Eoz and Dumb are mad because people embarrassed them by providing the pix.
I simply love to have my picture taken! It gives me a rush!
*shutter noise*
“motion to strike. Witness is both female and not in the kitchen.”
VERY funny indeed
I don’t care how old a meme is, if it was a meme to begin with, if someone submitted it themselves, if they were being funny “on purpose”, if it looks like something posted somewhere else, if it looks ‘shopped, if they had tiny grammatical errors, or any other crap you people post on here to try to make it less funny for the rest of us.
I think it’s hilarious. Get over it.
Seconded.
Agreed. While I didn’t exactly LOL, I did make tiny rainbow dots on my screen. Pretty!
RED IS A F**KING BOSS xDD Really enjoyed it ahah Seems like a cool guy
Actually, “pics or it didn’t happen” is exactly like court. You need to prove your statement with evidence. I should know, I’m Ace Torneyman.
Pet Detective?
who the hell is ace torneyman?
Ace Attorney Man. Lawyer joke.
Maybe he meant “Ace Attorney man” like Phoenix Wright and Miles Edgeworth. Even though Edgeworth is a prosecutor, but anyway…
Ace attorney is a video game series that started the meme “OBJECTION!”
OBJECTION! he didnt mean Ace atttorney man, it was used as a name for a pun!
This is fake! Pics or it didn’t… hem… nevermind!
I would definitely hire Red as my attorney. LOL!
this is hilarious
Ha! Brilliant :’)
I voted on this one; you guys need pics or do you just believe me?
WIIIIIN
If you found this to be too long, than thats entire to your loss; this has got to be one of the biggest WIN out there
I find it a little sad that I talk like this on occasion, having grown up with a dad who constantly watches old episodes of “perry mason.”
Irrelevant, incompetent, and immaterial! *smacks Hamilton Burger upside the head*
Pics, or I didn’t comment!
Haha, as a girl, even i find this hilarious. You’re my hero red.
I agree! “Witness is both female and not in the kitchen” made me almost spit out my water I was laughing so hard.
What the hell are you doing out of the kitchen? Didn’t Red teach you anything?
She’s using a laptop dumbass
Let me rephrase that: Why the hell are you on the laptop when you could be making me a sandwich! And don’t say you’re looking for recepies, there are none on Failbook
Ingredients:
½ Cup Mayonnaise
1 Tablespoon Hot Dijon Mustard
12-14 Slices Whole Cracked Wheat Bread
1 Head Lettuce
8-10 Slices American Cheese
½ Pound Deli Style Ham
½ Pound Deli Style Turkey
1 Large Tomato, Sliced
8-10 Slices Cooked Bacon
Information:
Serving Size 4-5
245 Calories Per Serving
15 Grams Of Fat
Cooking Directions:
These Club Sandwiches are served Great cold or toasted. Add mayo and hot mustard to a mixing bowl and blend. Spread mixture evenly over each piece of bread. To assemble these wonderful sandwiches layer 1 slice of toast mayo side up. 1 leaf lettuce, 1 slice cheese, 2 slices ham, 1-2 slices tomato, 1 slice bread mayo side down, 1 slice cheese, 2-3 slices turkey, 2 slices cooked bacon, 1 leaf lettuce and finally top with the last piece of toast mayo side down. Secure all club sandwiches with toothpicks and cut diagonally.
I make amazing sandwichs for my boyfriend… so he allows me to have a lap top and a PS3 in the kitchen. I know.. I know.. I’m spoiled.
I make my boyfriend awesome sandwiches! So he allows me to have a laptop and the PS3 in the kitchen when he’s at work. I know.. I know.. I’m spoiled
Sexism fail. As usual. *yawn* Poor, threatened menfolk that can’t accept reality.
You had me at “*yawn*”
Feminatzeehs! My gender is good-er!
ITS SEX NOT GENDER.
@Jenbol
Are you bisexual?
No?
Then you realize that you’re sexist, right?
Do you think men can get pregnant?
No?
Then you realize your sexist, right?
Poor, self-victimized feminists who can’t accept reality
Well that’s the point. Who thinks like that?
Sexism: Treating the genders differently based on gender.
If you won’t have sex with men because they’re men, that’s being sexist. If you won’t have sex with women being women, that’s sexist too.
If you believe that a man with a large gut can’t possibly be that way due to pregnancy (while a woman could be that way due to pregnancy), then that’s being sexist.
The idea I’m presenting is that to be non-sexist, you must be a willful idiot. Because the only way to be non-sexist is to ignore reality.
So, yes, I’m “sexist” because I refuse to be an idiot and ignore reality.
I won’t stop till someone says sex not gender.
P.S. I have an intelligent(?) reply to your 8:52 post that I think you might appreciate still waiting in moderation. I hope it makes it out so that you can see it and spend yer own time thinking about the ramifications.
you got me at ‘intelligent conversation on the internet’. there are those who possess such a quality, but on the internet, these are like guys at a party who have given up drinking. too few, considered boring and generally shunned and/or discouraged. and in the same way, the smarter ones drink to fit in.
Can we have some kind of auction to belt Red in the mouth with a 3′ length of rebar?
You mean pink
^Win.
I lol’d.
That would be freaking funny.
That is pretty funny, especially at the end.
That would be funnier if “kitchen” and “sammich” weren’t involved. Y’know, you think it’s harmless and funny, but it offends me, because this s**t actually happened for millennia, and we’re f**king done being slaves.
Right, and humans have had kitchens and sandwiches for millennia…….
As a woman I have to say quit crying about the kitchen crap. It’s funny. This post is funny. It is meant to be ridiculous. Oh no.. we can’t laugh at anything because this one time someone’s feelings were hurt. Stop it. We need to make jokes and laugh at things. It’s the people that take stuff too seriously that are out hurting other people. How dare you laugh at my ancestors for being “sammich” makers! Kill the fuse on your tampon and RELAX and laugh and make jokes back.
Maybe if more people could laugh and not take themselves so freaking seriously we could have a more peaceful world.
Exactly!
Violet wins the internet.
Argument over.
What Violet said!
And while girls are supposed to be makin’ sammiches, why are we guys sitting here on the computer when guys should be at a construction site or in an office making money. (just helping your point Violet)
See, girls just need to counter with that, it’s meant to be outrageous.
/win Violet.
What decade are you living?
You will never be able to get ahead if you think that every comment, every artical, every news source, every view in every culture is out to get you. Bad things happen people of all races, cultures, sexes. Someone out there doesn’t like you. They will make life tough. The more you give in and get upset the more they win. You’re making yourself victim for no reason.
These in the kitchen comments should be laughed off if for no other reason than to say we see your view as crap. Women fought hard to not have to have be in the kitchen anymore. Unless you live in a third world country or culture you have a choice to the life you want to live.
If you want to make your own life miserable by crying at the sight of models and being offended by every joke made at a woman’s expence that is your choice. You also have a choice to be a strong woman, laugh off the crap and work whatever job you like. We don’t have to give up anything we don’t want to.
If this were Facebook, I’d totally like this comment.
TL;DR
Least you didn’t say gender.
Who ain’t a slave?
What a cry baby. Women were never treated like slaves. Africans, Asians, and Native Americans were treated like slaves. Way to down play the suffering and horrific maltreatment of entire cultures.
Witness: *flashes*
Judge: “Proceed with the case.”
This is an interesting court
Your honor, I’d like to make a motion to have the rest of this session videotaped to put up on the internet. Do I have a second?
Sustained. Please continue.
Would this be a good time for a C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER.
refering to the courty talk of course
God I love a good gender fight!! Haahahahah god I’m a lady and that was hella funny, get over yourselves girls. How much better would this be if the last comment was a link to her (censored!) pics and it did happen??
*Laughs* *runs off to kitchen to make sammiches*
Your a tool.
wow Im hurt….. tool. XD haters gonna hate.
lol. I’m a chick here, and while I obviously have respect for myself, I know the rules. YOU DO NOT GET FAIRNESS ON TEH INTERNETZ, ONLY TROLLS.
THANK YOU!
sex not gender. seriously. its a fact.
Who even let you learn how to read when you couda been making sammaches!
Not worth giving a woman a computer if she isn’t using it for recipes!
My husband let me learn to read, if he didn’t I wouldn’t be able to follow a recipe, and I do use my computer for recipes! and for the record, I am still in the kitchen, I have a laptop, so please don’t hit me.
feminazis, lighten up
feminism is over, it doesn’t work
somebody’s gotta raise the kids and make me a sammich already, i’m hungry…
Red guy was a good troll . I can do better though (inb4 pics or didn’t happen
)
ROFLMFAOOOOOOOOOOO
Red is awesome. xD
that was easily the best one in a while
Red is a tool. So is pink.
too long; didn’t read.
*slowly stands and applauds*
And that, sir, is how you argue on the internet.
I love it how people can trawl through pages and pages of 2-5 line posts, but one 20 comment post and they’re reduced to ‘TL;DR’
You know, I kind of love this guy and hate him at the same time. Maybe that’s just my relationship with teh internetz.
Took me reading all the comments and getting to bendy’s to figure out what TL;DR meant.
I am really really sick of how if it’s a man or a penis, it’s a FAIL. But if it involves making fun of a woman, breasts, or being chauvinistic it’s a WIN.
TY Red, TY Failbook!
How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb?
Trick question! Feminists can’t change anything…
*like*
I’m sorry, I can’t hear you all over the sound of “I Kissed A Boy” playing in my head.
( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwX7MjJLqaA )
I freakin’ LOVE Red.
Epic Win!
Summary: Red guy is chauvinist bästard who gets in debate with smart woman over the validity of the ‘pics or it did not happen’ rule. Smart woman trounces idiot male’s arguments and chauvinist blather. Chauvinist male makes mildly – and I mean VERY mildly – amusing remark, requesting another proof by pics. Ironically, since they were debating the validity of this very notion, his request itself could only be justified if he had already won the debate.
Conclusion: If you TLDR this, you are far better off than those of us who wasted our time reading it.
Unless red is a troll, in which case, genius.
duh red is a troll.
Summary: You suck
Summaries are short and concise. You fail.
Dude, you couldn’t be more wrong. Red danced circles around the girl. Of course he’s being a troll, and it was funny and original. The girl stuck with a boring feminist talking point. Here’s your bus pass to Idiotville, they refused to sell it to me until I told them it was for you.
Hey man, using blake to get to idiot ville isn’t cool.
Intellect + Wit = Humorous
tl;dr
Also the game.
Red is a complete ass. I’d hire him in a second.
Epic F**king Win!
Red is awesome, made my day
For f**ks sake pink, you’re a discredit to your own gender.
Red’s gonna get kicked in the face one day though..
This is coming from a girl btw. I’m a lady. I wear lady’s things.
sex not gender. Christ this is annoying. Im going to go make a samich.
For f**ks sake pink, you’re a discredit to your own gender.
REd’s gonna get kicked in the face one day though..
freakin’ hilarious…
the more i read this (the actual post) the funnier it gets. then i scroll thrugh the comments.. and its that much funnier!
mighty funny, but this is just for the lulz in teh interwebz. irl this is a very serious matter. women=men. which doesn’t mean that this isn’t epic. which it is.
Rule 200. Rule could not be met. Case closed.
i want to meet red
It’s the topping that makes this one stand out (yes and the potential nipples in the flashing) because it makes for a perfect (and I almost puke when I say this) circle of life…
And now I’m on top of the world. Good thing a brought a portable kitchen and laptop to make samichs and tell people its sex not gender. WHICH IT IS.
whats tl;dr ??
Just because you write [WIN] doesn’t make it so. I suggest TL;DR on this one.