The biggest fail in this isn’t the alleged misspelled word, it’s the fact that she is just regurgitating a philosophy that was originated from a pop song by Christina Aguilera that is almost a decade old now.
The guy gets all the glory, the more he can score / But the girl do the same thing, you call her a whore.
Selene, that attitude of “promiscuous man as conqueror” might fly in high school, but that’s about as far as it goes. Around here we’re not afraid to call a man-wh*re when we see one.
As for women being called s!uts, who do you think is doing all this name-calling? I’ll give you a hint; it’s not guys.
This person may really have mean that a girl gets called a slur (a term of disparagement). The replies are funny, but I don’t think the original post is a fail.
I couldn’t help but notice, that he copied it almost directly from a Sickipedia joke. The only thing he changed is the word “crappy”, so it wouldn’t get censored.
Not just society, biology. Think about it, a female can only bear one child at a time while a male has no such limit. Therefore the best way for a male to ensure his genes are passed on is to impregnate as many females a possible, while a female’s best bet is to find a mate to stay and help raise the child.
And your point is exactly? Clearly you understand that technically all twins and anything more than one child is a fluke of nature. The odds are not in the favor of the woman that she will have a multiple birth pregnancy. Further, if she has more than one that both will be born healthy, absent medical intervention.
And is actually the only way one is allowed to refer to a woman in the military. At least in America.
I’ll never forget the harsh smoking we received because one female in my platoon called another “that girl”.
It is not entirely unheard of to have twins, triplets, or even quadruplets. Not to even mention looking at other species of mammals outside of our own homo sapiens…
If you instead meant that females can only carry one set of children at a time, then yes, you are correct.
But, it is more likely that the promiscuous woman will have an std than the promiscuous man. Woman can develop an std by simply having too much sex or sex with too many men, whether any of those men had an std or not. That, I think, is why it’s kind of okay for a guy to sleep around but not a girl. Sex is a form of trauma for the special lady parts and this trauma can result in infection and stds even if the woman is utilizing proper protection and proper hygiene. Also, men can carry several stds and not actually be infected and easily pass them on to women. Just saying.
What can women catch just by having too much sex with an uninfected partner? Are you talking about BV? Because that is usually sexual in nature, but it doesn’t have to be.
There are several, men can carry hpv and never actually have it, it gets passed on to a woman and usually clears up on its own, but can cause a lot of other problems including cancer, warts and painful periods. it can also cause a woman to feel a great deal of pain during sex. There is something else that can be caused by having too much sex, i can’t think of the name of it (and don’t feel like looking it up, but there is a warning about it in every box of tampons lol) but it can also be caused by wearing a tampon for too long or if you’re using tampons that are too big for you. It’s not actually an std, but can be caused by too much sex and makes you very sick, in some cases it can even be fatal.
Well, if a man can pass around an STD without infection, does that not make him rather dangerous? Who knows how many he could infect unknowingly because of the lack of symptoms. Surely he, too, should refrain from careless and excessive sex, if the women are advised to. He may not suffer the consequences as much as women, but he certainly shares the responsibility. Maybe a little manning up is in order here.
Might not be a fail at all. Women are often called many different slurs when considered promiscuous. Red didn’t necessarily mean to type s**t and hit the wrong one.
I have four separate house keys … and each lock you’re referring to are identical to one another – they’re not “many locks” just replicas of one … bad bad analogy Dan (and previous poster) … pff phallic analogies ^_-
Agreed, many different locks would require many different keys, while several identical locks may be opened with the same key… so like, a guy can bone a bunch of girls as long as they are identical twins, triplets, quadruplets ect. Also, this should mean that if several keys are made (identical twin, triplet, or quadruplet guys) that one lock (girl) can be opened by them all!!!
There’s a reason for this double standard. It’s easy for a girl to get laid, all she has to do is go to a bar and make herself available. A guy actually has to put real time and effort into picking up a girl, therefore it’s considered an accomplishement
Not really a double-standard since the equivalent for men is “cheater”. No one really cares nowadays if a woman is promiscuous unless she is unfaithful or is stealing someone’s boyfriend, which is when the slurs come out.
I care when a woman gets around. It interferes with my urge to get with her. Such a turn off to know I’ll be dipping where several dozen other men have.
I’m creepy because I don’t want to date or sleep with someone that’s a s**t?
Don’t worry. You’ll eventually grow up and find out that women aren’t objects and you can do other entertaining things with besides sex… although the sex part is a definite plus.
The major reason for this is the overriding morals in our society that say that a girl should be virtuous and faithful and pure. A guy has to go out and hunt for girls that are willing to sleep with him. Since girls arent supposed to just sleep with any guy and sort of “defend her temple” from the onslaught of guys offering her sex at every turn so that she doesnt get a disease or pregnant by someone she doesnt want to spend the rest of her life with… when that stuff happens guys dont want to marry her. It also makes guys think that if you’re promiscuous now you wont be faithful once you get married… not that them being promiscuous now makes girls think any better but women are supposed to “tie men down” from sewing their wild oats or whatever and domesticate the man and make him “settle down” to start a family. While the guy … you know from the caveman days… wants to impregnate as many woman as possible to ensure he spreads his genetic material as much as possible to continue the species… its not logical right now but its (as joe rogan says) “some of that left over monkey s**t”.
I believe that society is beginning to redefine these terms, so that ‘slut’ is merely ‘female player.’ Or even ‘hot girl.’
I also suspect she meant to write ‘slut’ and not ‘slur,’ even though ‘slur’ makes sense in this context.
‘S!ut’ apparently requires moderation. So this may be double posted.
I believe that society is beginning to redefine these terms, so that ‘s!ut’ is merely ‘female player.’ Or even ‘hot girl.’
I also suspect she meant to write ‘s!ut’ and not ‘slur,’ even though ‘slur’ makes sense in this context.
I don’t understand … this poster’s wording makes perfect sense … not funny in itself – but a bit amusing seeing how people still make fun of it anyway, on an assumption that he/she meant “slut”
Wait a minute. I think “slut” can very easily be “hot girl”, although the two are NOT synonymous. I love sluts. I would marry one no problem! In fact, hands down I would prefer one over a pure and innocent virgin. And I am not alone
She could have meant slur as in the actual word, meaning a derogatory name like hoe or w***e OR s**t. It is not a clear cut fail.
The biggest fail in this isn’t the alleged misspelled word, it’s the fact that she is just regurgitating a philosophy that was originated from a pop song by Christina Aguilera that is almost a decade old now.
The guy gets all the glory, the more he can score / But the girl do the same thing, you call her a whore.
If you think Christina Aguilera was the first one to take note of this double standard, I have some bad news for you….
THE GAME – YOU JUST LOST
Comment Win! I would like to present you with the Gold Star Award for your Wonderfully Intelligent Grasp of the English language!
Comment Win! I would like to present you with the Gold Star Award for your Wonderfully Intelligent Grasp of the English language!
A slur is an insult. It’s not necessarily a typo.
considering the r is next to the t on the keyboard, I’d say it’s a pretty good bet that it’s a typo.
Also, it was posted from a cell phone. Could also be auto-correct fail.
Either way, it tickled me.
TBH I never thought being a player was perceived as a good thing so I don’t know why he is getting high fives for it lol
Beleive me, the ass usually gets high-fives for it. Our society is unbeleivably sexist.
Hate to break it to you, but reality is sexist.
I’m… too sexist for my slurs, too sexy for my slurs, so sexy… it hurts!
LOL!!!
Selene, that attitude of “promiscuous man as conqueror” might fly in high school, but that’s about as far as it goes. Around here we’re not afraid to call a man-wh*re when we see one.
As for women being called s!uts, who do you think is doing all this name-calling? I’ll give you a hint; it’s not guys.
its because its harder to be “player” than to be a “s**t” (in this case slur
) ..reason? all u have to do as a girl ..spred ur legs..
girls get high fives too… on there ass XD
This person may really have mean that a girl gets called a slur (a term of disparagement). The replies are funny, but I don’t think the original post is a fail.
When a key opens many locks, it is called a master key. When a lock is opened by many keys, it is a crappy lock.
I couldn’t help but wonder… if you have a valid point, sir.
I couldn’t help but notice, that he copied it almost directly from a Sickipedia joke. The only thing he changed is the word “crappy”, so it wouldn’t get censored.
Don’t have time to copy stuff from sites I never visit because I’m too busy being a master key.
Girl parts and boy parts are not locks and keys so that is stupid.
Not really: girl parts are locks bc we as a society expect women to be the deciding force of whether a guy has sex with her
Not just society, biology. Think about it, a female can only bear one child at a time while a male has no such limit. Therefore the best way for a male to ensure his genes are passed on is to impregnate as many females a possible, while a female’s best bet is to find a mate to stay and help raise the child.
lies. in sexist and stupidity. i am a TWIN and my friends are TRIPLETS…
And your point is exactly? Clearly you understand that technically all twins and anything more than one child is a fluke of nature. The odds are not in the favor of the woman that she will have a multiple birth pregnancy. Further, if she has more than one that both will be born healthy, absent medical intervention.
Your point, if you have one, is moot.
Fail. Women should have sex with as many men as possible to ensure the best genes for the child. Duh.
Also, I don’t think very highly of people who refer to women as ‘females’.
Personally, I don’t think very highly of people who refer to female dogs, female cats, female whales, or female deer (sic!) as “women”.
You need to study some more biology. You’re completely wrong.
Also, within the realms of academic discussion, using “females” is perfectly acceptable.
And is actually the only way one is allowed to refer to a woman in the military.
At least in America.
I’ll never forget the harsh smoking we received because one female in my platoon called another “that girl”.
It is not entirely unheard of to have twins, triplets, or even quadruplets. Not to even mention looking at other species of mammals outside of our own homo sapiens…
If you instead meant that females can only carry one set of children at a time, then yes, you are correct.
ROFL …. wow
But, it is more likely that the promiscuous woman will have an std than the promiscuous man. Woman can develop an std by simply having too much sex or sex with too many men, whether any of those men had an std or not. That, I think, is why it’s kind of okay for a guy to sleep around but not a girl. Sex is a form of trauma for the special lady parts and this trauma can result in infection and stds even if the woman is utilizing proper protection and proper hygiene. Also, men can carry several stds and not actually be infected and easily pass them on to women. Just saying.
What can women catch just by having too much sex with an uninfected partner? Are you talking about BV? Because that is usually sexual in nature, but it doesn’t have to be.
There are several, men can carry hpv and never actually have it, it gets passed on to a woman and usually clears up on its own, but can cause a lot of other problems including cancer, warts and painful periods. it can also cause a woman to feel a great deal of pain during sex. There is something else that can be caused by having too much sex, i can’t think of the name of it (and don’t feel like looking it up, but there is a warning about it in every box of tampons lol) but it can also be caused by wearing a tampon for too long or if you’re using tampons that are too big for you. It’s not actually an std, but can be caused by too much sex and makes you very sick, in some cases it can even be fatal.
Toxic Shock Syndrome?
Well, if a man can pass around an STD without infection, does that not make him rather dangerous? Who knows how many he could infect unknowingly because of the lack of symptoms. Surely he, too, should refrain from careless and excessive sex, if the women are advised to. He may not suffer the consequences as much as women, but he certainly shares the responsibility. Maybe a little manning up is in order here.
Damn you, I was gonna say that >_<
Round here, for an extra $20 you can get the slur to call you names and insult you.
Her comment actually makes sense. They should be making fun of the people making fun of her.
Technically, being called a s**t is being called a slur. So, it’s more like the responders failed than the poster.
Fail by coincidence that “r” is next to “t” on a “qwerty” keyboard. Not exactly the greatest fail in the world.
If a key opens lots of locks, then it’s a master key, but if a lock is opened by lots of keys then it’s a s**tty lock
Might not be a fail at all. Women are often called many different slurs when considered promiscuous. Red didn’t necessarily mean to type s**t and hit the wrong one.
A TYPO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL BEST FAIL EVAR
you seem easily plead
DOH. *pleased
It’s not necessarily even a typo.
slow day in the office, Failbook?
ummmm TYPOOOOO hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaa thats not a fail i do tht s**t alll the timeeeee hahaha retards!!
Ha ha! And that, everyone, is an example of slurring a group of people!
A key is meant to fit into many locks and a lock is only supposed to be opened by one key.
I have four separate house keys
… and each lock you’re referring to are identical to one another – they’re not “many locks” just replicas of one … bad bad analogy Dan (and previous poster) … pff phallic analogies ^_-
Agreed, many different locks would require many different keys, while several identical locks may be opened with the same key… so like, a guy can bone a bunch of girls as long as they are identical twins, triplets, quadruplets ect. Also, this should mean that if several keys are made (identical twin, triplet, or quadruplet guys) that one lock (girl) can be opened by them all!!!
Ah bugger delete the last comment I made, someone else made it before me. >_<
no, I think she meant to write s**t. The T and R are right next to each other.
it’s easy to be a s**ut but hard to be a player. but if you like sex ladies, s**t it up. i’ll still love you all. just be careful.
If a key opens a lot of locks then it is the master key. If a lock is opened by heaps of keys, then it is a pretty s**tty lock.
These are the worst comments ever
Jane, you ignorant slur!
my theory is that only S**TS say this…why dont you and your s**t friends start high-fiving each other and F*ck everybody else? (literally)
THANK YOU. Who do you think is FAILING to high-five the ‘s**ts’? It’s not guys; we wouldn’t be anyway.
The fail in this (intended) comment goes on ‘ladies who fail to high-five’ alone, not ALL of society.
There’s a reason for this double standard. It’s easy for a girl to get laid, all she has to do is go to a bar and make herself available. A guy actually has to put real time and effort into picking up a girl, therefore it’s considered an accomplishement
Not really a double-standard since the equivalent for men is “cheater”. No one really cares nowadays if a woman is promiscuous unless she is unfaithful or is stealing someone’s boyfriend, which is when the slurs come out.
I care when a woman gets around. It interferes with my urge to get with her. Such a turn off to know I’ll be dipping where several dozen other men have.
Be careful hanging around elementary schools. Maybe buy a dog for cover.
Wow, you told me! Your originality is overwhelming. I doubt I’ll recover from such a clever tongue-lashing.
Yeah. This is why you’re kind of creepy. Also why the OP has a point, whether or not they spelled it right.
I’m creepy because I don’t want to date or sleep with someone that’s a s**t?
Don’t worry. You’ll eventually grow up and find out that women aren’t objects and you can do other entertaining things with besides sex… although the sex part is a definite plus.
I think I like you, lol.
The major reason for this is the overriding morals in our society that say that a girl should be virtuous and faithful and pure. A guy has to go out and hunt for girls that are willing to sleep with him. Since girls arent supposed to just sleep with any guy and sort of “defend her temple” from the onslaught of guys offering her sex at every turn so that she doesnt get a disease or pregnant by someone she doesnt want to spend the rest of her life with… when that stuff happens guys dont want to marry her. It also makes guys think that if you’re promiscuous now you wont be faithful once you get married… not that them being promiscuous now makes girls think any better but women are supposed to “tie men down” from sewing their wild oats or whatever and domesticate the man and make him “settle down” to start a family. While the guy … you know from the caveman days… wants to impregnate as many woman as possible to ensure he spreads his genetic material as much as possible to continue the species… its not logical right now but its (as joe rogan says) “some of that left over monkey s**t”.
TL;DR.
I believe that society is beginning to redefine these terms, so that ‘slut’ is merely ‘female player.’ Or even ‘hot girl.’
I also suspect she meant to write ‘slut’ and not ‘slur,’ even though ‘slur’ makes sense in this context.
‘S!ut’ apparently requires moderation. So this may be double posted.
I believe that society is beginning to redefine these terms, so that ‘s!ut’ is merely ‘female player.’ Or even ‘hot girl.’
I also suspect she meant to write ‘s!ut’ and not ‘slur,’ even though ‘slur’ makes sense in this context.
I don’t think people will ever let s**t and hot girl be synonymous.
I sure hope not. Or I’ll never be a hot girl. Although there are other adjectives that I would chose over hot…
Slurs are bad, but racial slurs are the worst.
I love how people have to break down everything instead of just lol’ing.
Hilarity aside: The term “man-slut” exists for a reason, missy.
Men do the work, but women do the labor. The man pays the bills, but the woman pays the price.
Typos arnt funny..
Those four failers failed
I don’t understand … this poster’s wording makes perfect sense … not funny in itself – but a bit amusing seeing how people still make fun of it anyway, on an assumption that he/she meant “slut”
Wait a minute. I think “slut” can very easily be “hot girl”, although the two are NOT synonymous. I love sluts. I would marry one no problem! In fact, hands down I would prefer one over a pure and innocent virgin. And I am not alone
Because girls are attracted to promiscuous males. There good reason for the slurs. That behavior spreads disease.
Nah its fine guys who drive nice cars have small penises lol
One could ask: Why do women who go for younger men get called “cougars”, while men who go after younger women get called “perverts”?