Submitted by: Unknown
It would be sweet justice if Dog The Bounty Hunter was sent after you.
-
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous I’d Stop Making Fun Of Americans If We Didn’t Make It So Easy | Taint Nothing Wrong With That Next »
I sincerely hope Karma has come around and kicked Mark’s ass!
Who’s Mark?
Mark is what was left of the dog on 19th Street after Mike rolled by in his truck…
The face book posting is fake, but Hobson’s Choice gets a WIN.
i dont think it was fake
You kidding me? Completely fake… after 9 hours, no one else responds to it, for one… two, their grammar is the exact same… three, it’s set up very mechanically… this SCREAMS fake.
I don’t care if it’s fake, I’m still laughing so hard I fell out of my chair.
Agreed. Fake though it may be, it’s hilarious. This is being linked to everyone who owes me money.
So… If me and my friend had the same grammar skill, does that mean we’re clones? You’re a f’ing genius.
I think you have too much faith in humanity.
Totally fake. It it was real, then Mikes post would be above Russells
it depends facebook is slow sometimes with the responds like some msgs get put up on dif walls it shows dif stuff dude
Orr the person who sent it in edited it so that Russells post was under Mikes…
Yeah, and the fact it states at first that he wants to get his truck repainted and then the guy in the wall post suggests that he should get his car painted. And why didn’t Russel comment instead?!
look above i hit his reply on accident
not really … maybe people dont reply to him? like maybe he’s and ass? like he already looks like -.-..
and maybe they both talk like that?
I hope so too, whoever Mark is!
You’re about as dumb as him. His name’s Mike, moron.
God, I hate rednecks. Trucks are not a “way of life.” They’re f****ing vehicles and killing animals with them does not prove how big you penis is. It actually has the opposite effect.
Killing animals makes your penis smaller?
lol, nice.
Actually, yes. Unfortunately I had to learn this the hard way. Next time a bear attacks my tent I’ll have to use a tranquilizer instead. I can’t afford to lose any more girth..
can u imagine how depressed elephant poachers are with their sex life?
What about Whale Hunters? They’re all Japanese… Hmm… This explains a LOT.
Lol I’ve often wondered that… Another of life’s mysteries solved!!
Hehe!
…uh oh
Just because she was one letter off doesn’t mean she is dumb. She agrees with you otherwise. Don’t be so harsh.
M.I.K.E…M.A.R.K…if you ask me, she was way more than 1 letter off. She only got one letter right.
ya she was of for the spellling but you were off oor the math that is y rednecks shouldent breed with first cosins
Yeah, you aren’t exactly in the position to be correcting anyone about anything. :I
Dude, you are the moron for making some stupid comment. She might not be a redneck, and EVERYONE makes typos, so shut the f**k up. You’re the one that shouldn’t breed, but that’s just my opinion.
Actually, Mike and Mark are 3 letters off. The only similarity is that they both have an M and a K in them.
^^ woops
Phonetically, the difference between Mark and Mike is very small.
Mike and Mark, have four letters each. You say that she’s three letters off, but say M & K are the same…. hmmm, 4 – 2 = 2.
Or do you simply mean that she lost an I and an E, and found an A & R, which is actually four letters off. But then took the average 2 + 4 / 2 = 3 ? Which ever way it is…WHY THE FECK DOES IT MATTER??? lol
Arty…? 2 + 4/2 = 4 not 3
Fail
Unless 2 + 4 is in parenthesis.
How did you know the poster is a she? Probably you.
I’m a redneck…I drive a big truck…I’m a girl. I have no penis.
and so the person got the names mized up, they are both real popular. No one said Trucks are a way of life, and not everyone who drives a big truck runs over animals and laughs about it
I for one think its really sad and I hope that lady beats the piss outta him
oh and also, if this was real wouldnt the getting it repainted one be on top and the running over be under it?
It would be all over since he is going to tell the cops to look for a black truck.
not necessarily, his “friend” might have made the connection that he is getting his car painted because he hit the dog so then replied to him.
but, its proably still fake
it would depend on when the last reply posting was. cuz if someone posts a reply to something you posted like last week it will show up ontop.
Yes, because only rednecks take unrealistic pride in their vehicles and use them as status symbols…
In vehicles, nah. In trucks, yes.
I don’t know, I’ve known quite a few rich kids who take pride in trucks. Never too old for Tonka, I guess…
I don’t remember there being anything about someone’s vehicle being their way of life. Love it? yes, but I think that you’re reading waaaay too much into this.
Sounds like someone’s just bitter.
It was mentioned in an earlier post. Scroll up.
Dude, with a name like Bubba, you really shouldn’t be talking.
See what I did there…with the generalizing thing???
Pounciful was pretty much agreeing with you, just had the wrong name. Get over yourself.
so if you breed animals it makes your weiner bigger?
helll yeah!
they aren’t rednecks, the rockstar rims are the 19 year old suburbia “bros” get your facts straight hippy.
Who’s Mark?
Who’s Mark?
Mike dude, Mike.
Who the judge is Mark?
Who the HELL is Mark? MORON
Get the F**K out, S**TFACE.
Mark?
Who the f**k is Mark? What did he do to deserve an ass kicking from karma?
oh hai Mark!
I C wat u did thar
I did not hit her. I did not!!!
hahahahaha.
you win
^ Win.
Mark would be a kindly applied pseudonym for the jackass who would hit a dog.
*wonders if anyone is buying it*
Ok, so I was sneaking a look at work and typed fast. Shut up =P
If this is true, I hope that guy really did turn that bastard into the woman.
Ok, killing a dog deserves retribution… but turning him into a woman? And into THAT woman? Isn’t that a little harsh for a first offense?
oh Ironica, LOLing my head off here
Yes. If you kill someone ELSE’s pet, you deserve to have your ‘dog’ killed.
Lol
Hahahahahaha this is too damn funny. It seems fake but still funny.
I hope someone smokes that mike motherf*cker
You don’t know what was really going on then if he swerved to miss the dog, he would have hit and killed a baby. So stop advocating baby killing, it’s just plain wrong!
Also smoking people seems like it would be gross, I know times are tough but just buy the cheap cigarettes instead.
Are… are you trying to be funny?
He’s not trying, he’s succeeding. What about you, are you trying the same thing?
im mark .. now every1 shut up
No, I’M Mark. Now YOU stfu.
Hmmm….I smell a rat – looks like a setup dialogue, to me!
already seen it, and yep it’s BS
The Douche dog killer’s name is mike, not mark.
this was on lamebook weeks ago. lame.
agreed!
Stealing is naughty.
who cares if it’s fake, IT’S HILARIOUS
hilariously fake
Fakely hilarious… wait… f**k the whole conversation!
I feel bad for the dog (and the family) but if there’s a leash law then technically Mike is right. She would have to pay him for the damage to his truck. He’s still an A$$ for not stopping, though.
Who’s Mark? I believe it says Mike up there. And it looks fake to me… think about how facebook works…. the dialogue (def. seems staged) would appear BEFORE the idiot would ask where to get his truck painted.
SO FAKE
The one on top is a Wall-to-Wall with Russell. The one below it is Mike’s status update. Facebook is showing the W-to-W with Russell on top because the latest posts happened after Mike’s update, even though the W-to-W *started* before Mike’s update. You understand? I’m just saying it *might not* be fake. Even though it still could be fake. But your explanation is faulty.
Joe, you keep posting this comment and it keeps not making sense.
1) The one on top is not a wall-to-wall. It is a wall post with a conversation happening through comments on that original post. Wall-to-wall looks very different. The time-stamp of the original post is what determines where the conversation appears on the Facebook wall. It would appear beneath the status update because the wall post itself occurred first.
2) Even if it were wall-to-wall, status updates don’t appear on wall-to-wall.
Your explanation is the faulty one.
Please shoot me if I ever become that much an expert on Facebook. Cause that would mean my social life has reached rock bottom. No offense, but Facebook nerdiness is wrong on so many levels.
Well, I have no idea how Facebook works at all. I don’t use it. If it weren’t for friends and family members who are always using it, I would have no idea what the website’s layout even was.
Wall-to-walls show the posts as individual posts. In this case, it’s a post-comment-comment-etc. So it’s fake, man.
Well, they were all posted around the same time, so I’m going to say that it’s too close to tell.
And if it is true, then the comment by Mike at the end makes him a dumbass and a jackass. Seriously.
You can totally comment on wall-to-wall. In fact, other people can comment too, at least if they’re on the friends lists for both the poster and the postee. You can have long conversations via wall-to-wall just as though it was a status feed post, it’s just more exclusive.
learn how to use the reply button
have you people QQing about the timing ever stopped to remember that facebook’s default view isn’t “Most Recent” which shows everything in chronological order, but rather “Top News” which seems to follow no logic whatsoever?
Thank you, Laura!
Lawl. Poor Puppy! But that is funny
haha, oh wow. This one is actually pretty funny. It looks like it might be fake, but whatever, still pretty funny anyway.
It’s fake alright, cause rednecks don’t spell that good
Those were very precise grammars and spelling……
But still good to put it here
on facebook, newer posts come up above older ones, therefore this is obviously made up. oh yes i went there
The one on top is a Wall-to-Wall with Russell. The one below it is Mike’s status update. Facebook is showing the W-to-W with Russell on top because the latest posts happened after Mike’s update, even though the W-to-W *started* before Mike’s update. You understand?
I’m just saying it *might not* be fake. Even though it still could be fake. But your explanation is faulty.
it’s not a wall to wall. you have to click see wall to wall before.
and you cant see status updates and wall to wall on the same screen.
unless it was edited…
Uh, yeah you can; if you go to Mike’s wall, you would see both his status updates and what others posted on his wall in the same feed. (Seriously, are there THIS many people who don’t use Facebook reading Failbook?)
*like*
WOW. I really hope that’s fake…because if not that guy makes me have even less faith in humanity. What a poor excuse for a human being.
My thoughts, too, Megan. Thanks for stating them.
I totally agree. I would find this funny if it didn’t remind me that some people actually have the same attitude as Mike.
Agreed. This is not funny at all, just depressing if it’s true and stupid if it’s fake. Having this on Failbook is a humor fail!
lol that’s one of the best responses I’ve ever heard of! *lol*
Totally fake
When are you going to start putting your money where your mouth is and post a link of the original?
If it’s a repeat, it shouldn’t be that hard to prove.
It’s kinda hard to get a link when you delete the old one.
That’s pretty funny.
im not sure if it was failbook, but it has been posted before, on either failbook or lamebook, been looking for it for about a hour now, if i find it, i will post a link
It was on lamebook. Which since different people read lamebook than failbook, and they are not the same site and run by different people, it’s not technically a “repeat”.
No no, we all know you’re conspiring against us. Of COURSE you deleted the old one as soon as one lamebrain called you out on a repeat.
Rofl!
You caught me! I am Skynet!
I think it’s funny how you address the fact that it’s a duplicate, but completely ignore the fact that it’s fake.
Animals are unpredictable – they will get run over. Even if this guy stopped and got out of the car to check on the animal, would that have changed anything? He is not liable if the dog ran out in front of his car. Accidents happen. Too bad for the owner of the dog, but there’s nothing anyone can do about it.
it is a crime in certain states, to run over a dog and drive away. Even if he is not at fault for the dog walking in front of his car. He is at fault for driving away. Hitting a dog and driving away is still a hit and run.
That’s extraordinarily retarded. What if I hit a dog on the left lane of 4-lane highway during 5 o’clock traffic? I’m not stopping for sh*t.
I’d bet that you would stop if it were a person though. Dogs feel as much pain as humans do.
if a man cut down a tree, and it squished a squirrel, would you hug the squirrel first, or the tree?
FOR THE WIN! – 1000 internets to you, sir/madam.
Two questions for you:
1) Explain how experience of pain or pleasure is possible without self-awareness. Sensing nervous information, sure, but interpreting it as pleasurable or painful without self-awareness, I don’t get.
Self-awareness is what makes us psychologically different from automatic machines, so how can feelings and emotion occur without it?
2) Give me proof dogs are self-aware without making the mistake of anthropomorphism.
Believing animals are like people is nice and all if you want to do that personally, but if you want to debate publicly then you should be aware that this topic a lot more complicated than you seem to think.
Holy crap you need to take some science courses
pain is not an emotion and does not require self-awareness. Really, there is no scientific debate over whether all mammals can feel pain. They test pankillers on animals for god’s sake.
I hope you get to see this, Mike. You loser. I hope your fine is $300 or more. I hope your license is suspended.
Too bad you won’t serve jail time for this.
Who cares, it’s a DOG.
And you’re a douchebag, but you’re still treated like a human being. Just because it’s a dog doesn’t mean it doesn’t deserve compassion, ass.
Yes, it deserves compassion. But it doesn’t deserve jail time, a suspended license, or a fine. Animals get run over all the time, but no one bats an eye until there’s a collar on it.
“No one” is probably a majority and not an absolute. Every animal that I’ve ever hit with my car accidentally, I’ve stopped, got out of my car and taken it out of the road. If it’s alive, it gets taken to a rescue. If not, then it gets a burial in the backyard.
(thankfully, the only thing I’ve hit is birds)
This is true, “no one” is not an absolute. But, you get my point.
Dogs over douchebags any day
He was lucky it wasn’t my dog. My dog would have taken a chunk out of the car, eaten the driver and eventually crapped out a decent human being.
Good dog.
*can’t follow story when you exagurate*……No, it would not!!
f**k you
Ok, this is totally fake. The post about getting his truck repainted would have been on top of the conversation he had because he would have posted it after his conversation. He obviously didn’t think that part through too clearly when he was making up a fake story.
The one on top is a Wall-to-Wall with Russell. The one below it is Mike’s status update. Facebook is showing the W-to-W with Russell on top because the latest posts happened after Mike’s update, even though the W-to-W *started* before Mike’s update. You understand?
I’m just saying it *might not* be fake. Even though it still could be fake. But your explanation is faulty.
looks like you know how to copy-paste, buddy.
Yeah, well, a REAL poster would have typed an entirely new paraphrase of exactly the same information in response to exactly the same criticism. You’re clearly better than Joe, because you didn’t C&P your last response to him.
nice copy & paste
Not sure where Mike lives, but in alot of states, he could be charged with felony animal cruelty. People like this Mike character disgust me.
I hope someone finds that Mike character and castrates him and then destroys his Dodge. What a waste.
waste of what? the dodge? cuz just making that dodge, im pretty sure, was a waste of materials in the first place.
For killing a dog!?!? It’s an animal people, not a person. He could be charged with a felony?!? There are murderers who have killed humans who don’t even get a felony charge!!! I’m not saying killing someone’s pet is okay at all, just that I think our judicial system has their priorities mixed up.
Ok, I don’t live is the US – There are states where murder isn’t a felony charge?
In the U.S. there are misdemeanour manslaughter cases and felony manslaughter cases. Though the majority of the misdemeanours are involuntary cases.
You know, I have a nice dog and I love her a lot, but just because you like animals doesn’t mean you should jump to conclusions like that.
First of all, why was the dog roaming free? Dogs don’t look right and left when crossing the road. If their view is obstructed by a wall or a parked car they can cross right in front of an incoming car.
I will admit that based on this Mike’s messages I am guessing he might be a careless driver and could in fact be capable of running animals over for pleasure. But then again, we don’t know that for sure and the dog roaming free has to raise some doubt in Mike’s favor.
In response to your first paragraph, I am also enjoy having my dogs. They are awesome, and most dog owners do. But, I have dealt with my dogs digging holes and escaping to the neighbors yard, and sometimes even escaping to our front yard. That could be an explanation.
In response to your second paragraph, it doesn’t matter if that is Mike’s general attitude towards running dogs over. It his is attitude (even if this is a fake post) towards KNOWING the fact he ran over the dog and his “Oh, it’s OK as long as nobody finds out” attitude, and his thinking that if anybody needs any sort of compensation, it his him for having to get dog and dents out of his car, when he isn’t even sorry, apparently, for running over someone’s beloved family member.
Of course, people don’t think the same as me. I am one of the few who think dogs lives are just as important as humans lives.
how crappy for the owner, yeah he shoulda stopped but oh well….and how is this fake? I mean, yeah, if the first post said 10 hours ago, and the second post(where he asks about paint jobs) said 9 hours ago, but they both say 9 hours ago. In fact, it looks like he hit the dog, did a mobile update, and then his buddy called him out on it.
So this whole conversation took place without a single other person interjecting? Hmm…
it happens. esp if they’re going back and forth right away, could be middle of the night fb’ing
You’re either an idiot or you work for failbook.
right. i’m an idiot because it’s happened to me before. i guess you have to be an idiot to get on fb at one, two, three in the morning, including me and my friends. i didn’t call you names, i merely implied it happens.
Of course. If someone posted a comment to your wall, your other friends won’t see it unless they go directly to your wall.
You’re overlooking the fact that these two might only have each other as friends on facebook, which is just as likely as any of the other possible scenarios put forth.
I agree with Chosenone. This year in Ontario a woman received a bill in the mail from an insurance company from a guy who hit her dog. There was a couple K worth of damage to the car. She admitted that she let her dog wander where he wanted to, this person had stopped tho. THIS jackass took the coward way out. So now sociopath Mike has a definite trail of destruction on his resume.
My yuks come from the BBW comment. Not only does he drive a big, obnoxious truck, but he also loves fat chicks. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
I plan to stroll off into the distance singing Big Girl by Mika.
lol, thought the same thing! I was like, “well, I guess if I want good wings, I should go wherever the big Beautiful Women” are
if it were less fake it would be funnier.
Wow failbook. You have f*cked up yet again.
Um where does it say it’s intentional? Dumb ass.
Intentional or not, he acted callously. “I smoked that motherf**ker” doesn’t exactly sound like an accident to me, but even if it was an accident, there’s no f**king excuse for that kind of attitude. That dog was someone’s goddamn family member. Accidents happen, but a decent human being would feel badly about it. I cried when a pigeon (which I was trying to avoid by slowing down and steering around it) ran under my tire and got killed, and that was just a pigeon. Dogs are family members, for f**k’s sake. If I ever hit a dog, I would not only fess up to the owners immediately, I’d personally pay for all the necessary vet bills/cremation fees. Hell, my dogs killed a bird once and I gave the bird a proper burial.
I like you, Bonnie. You’re my type of person.
Well, when you turn 13 or so you won’t be such a p**sy.
Well, when you turn 25 or so, you’ll not be such a douche.
And when you get your IQ above 60, they’ll let you write letters without a crayon.
Alot of people, when they do something really bad, they feel bad on the inside, so they make up for it by acting like it’s not a big deal on the outside. Don’t be so quick to judge. Last time I checked, it wasn’t illegal to be a douchebag.
Anyway, he didn’t owe a damn thing to the owners. They should have had their dog contained or on a leash. It’s really their fault.
um…you’re in PETA, aren’t you
I’m not in PETA but I do agree that dogs do get loose, so it might not have been the family’s fault.
I sense you’re from PETA. In this case, your comment in invalid, as you would be supporting the worst organization in the world, with a leader who should be stabbed then burned alive for her hypocritical cruelty to animals.
how do you know the dog was not contained or on a leash? It could be that the lady was walking her dog, and he got too close to the road–and while she was trying to pull him back, along came this big black truck and ran him over. The driver was too stupid to realize someone was standing right there.
Or maybe the dog was contained by an invisible fence, and the limits were to the presumably safe sidewalk, and this douchebag decided it would be fun to take his big black killing machine up onto the sidewalk where the dog was sitting. This guy sounds like a big enough douchebag to TRY to intentionally kill the dog.
Something similar happened to my friend, only the driver was drunk and weaving all over, and actually rolled up into the grass next to the sidewalk, where she was walking her dog. It was fortunate that my friend was not also hit.
Even so, it IS a crime to knowingly hit a dog or cat and not stop, just as it is to hit another vehicle and not stop. It’s called hit and run. In the case of hitting a pet, if the owner is in fact not around, one should call the authorities to report the incident.
It would be better if douchebags had to be leashed
The owner of that dog should have Mike’s tailpipe shoved up their asses for not caring enough about their dog to keep it safely confined. A parent who lets their similarly intelligent one year old child run loose near the street without supervision would get their kid taken away. If the kid in that situation gets run over, we’d crucify the parent. The dog’s owner should be charged with animal neglect. My pets are *never* loose, because I actually care about them enough to make that impossible.
In any event, if I hit someone’s dog, there’s [almost] no way I’m stopping to tell the owner. You never know what the distraught former dog-owner will do when you come up to the door dragging their friend’s lifeless carcass behind you. I’ll get out and move it off the road out of respect, but I don’t need to be there when some nutjob starts blaming me for their inability to protect their dog from its own blissful ignorance. It’s unfortunate, but the risk of coming up on a crazy person outweighs the possible reward of helping someone who’d actually be thankful that I stopped.
It’ll be better when you turn 13 or so. You’ll stop being such a p*ssy.
You say that, and yet if it were a human it probably wouldn’t be on failbook at all.
Why people choose to believe that animals (apart from humans) are worthless compared to us I don’t know, but when you think about it, they are probably worth much more than us. WE screw up the planet, WE kill most of the things we find, and still people think that animals are worthless? They have done nothing to deserve that treatment.
They feel pain just as much as we do.
you dont know his tone…he could’ve been in tears as he was typing that and letting out his frustration and sadness as he thought about that lil’ “motherf**ker”‘s life coming to and end
suuuuuure. He was just bawling to beat the band when he typed “smoked that motherf*cker.” bawling with mirth is most likely, the evil douchebag.
hey!
This is a fake. Mostley because the status to get the truck painted was set before the wall post. That’s why it’s under the wall post, not above it. Failbook Fails Again.
Actually, the post order could also be a result of Dumbass Mike posting the paint job order and Russell questioning him on it. So it could still be true.
i hope that guy will get what he deserves ^^;
Russell = win
Mike = fail
Legally, if your livestock (or pet) ar hit by someone while in the road you are liable for the damage to their vehicle. Its the animal owners responsibility to keep them out of the road.
mmmmm, livestock……not true in some states. in texas, if you hit a cow, you have to pay its owner for that cow and up to 7 generations it would have had.
I think the funniest part of all this is the comments.
Well said Melanie. I don’t think there is a city in this country that doesn’t have some sort of leash law.
It’s not a crime to hit dogs, you idiots, I don’t drive a truck, I drive a Cirrus and I try hard to hit dogs when they are in the road because they shouldn’t be in the damn road. It’s not a crime, it will never be a crime, you’re all dumb.
I hope you die. Seriously.
I second that.
While I agree you probably shouldn’t intentionally hit a dog, his principal is right. If the owner let’s the dog run free, then they should expect that the dog will eventually get hit. And it’s the owner’s fault if it does get hit, and as such should have to pay for car repairs.
Wow, you intentionally LOVE destroying your car? It must look like a pile of crap.
Children shouldn’t be in the road either, but you don’t see people barrelling towards them, do you?
Only if the driver is pedobear.
And I think he would be trying to get them in his van, instead of runnin them over.
A motor vehicle operator should be in control of his vehicle at all times. Yes, you could be charged with a crime for hitting a dog, but the charge could vary from reckless driving to failure to operate with due care.
You are a murderer.
I hope that one day, if you have kids, you let one of them run into the the street. It’s your responsibility to watch them right? So if I were to drive a large vehicle, and I were to drive at the legal speed in a residential area, and one of your kids ran into the street……you see where I’m going with this, don’t you? I may not see your child, and I may drive right over it and feel a damn thing. And then I could come to your door, and demand that you pay me for the damage my vehicle sustained. I think you’d be pretty pissed. Go die, ass.
*not feel
I have a friend whose brother had a seizure while driving. He drove across the median and hit an oncoming semi. He died, while the semi driver was fine.
The truck driver had a legitimate case against the brother’s estate for damage to his truck. It seemed awful for the family, but from the trucker’s perspective, his business was impacted by someone else who was clearly at fault.
In exactly the same way, while more people would be sad about this incident if it was a child rather than a dog involved (or if this really happened, which is also not the case), it does not change the fact that accidentally hitting something in the road is considered the fault of whomever was responsible for the object – not the driver. Ergo, you *can* demand payment from the parents for damage to the vehicle, if the damage was caused by an unsupervised child accidentally getting run over (perhaps popping out from behind a parked car). The law doesn’t change based on the cuteness of the thing which caused the damage, or by how “pissed” the responsible part would be over receiving the bill.
Intentionally hitting a child – just like intentionally hitting a dog – is a different case entirely.
It’s called animal cruelty. I know that in Washington State, it’s a CLASS C FELONY, dumbass!!!!
S**t. Can’t belive this got posted on here >.< The dodge is now green by the way :/
I found you! $300, here I come.
Fail x10000000000000
His name is mike. Not mark. You suck >.< wetawd.
this entire list of comments is a fail. No one can add or spell.
What a piece of s**t. He deserves it for multiple reasons. And yes, dumbass, it is a f**king crime.
That’s horrible
I hope it is a fake.
really? so when the cops come after you for running over a dog im pretty sure you change your attitude.
i hope he get animal cruelty charge on him. wat a douche
Hello, everyone! I’m here to spread the wonderful word of equality! Did you know that all humans are equal? It’s true! No one person is greater or lesser than another! Isn’t that great?! God made us that way, and God expects us to treat each other that way, so make sure you’re kind to everyone you see!
Do you believe in equality? Good! Let’s make this world a better place and spread the word together that all human beings are equal!
you do realize that by spamming your message all across sites that are trying to entertain people by pointing out the failure of others, your annoying them so much that your message is paid no attention, right?
It’s not that I’m annoying – It’s that these people don’t believe in treating everyone fairly and with respect.
Did you know, not every believes your “god” exists? It’s true! Hell, posting on a site like failbook probably isn’t going to go very far.
And Jesus totally got pwnd by that guy with a spear…
This has nothing to do with God, it’s about equality. I am simply making sure everyone knows that all humans are equal. Humor is good, cruelty is not. And I was hurt a few posts back. This is revenge.
“God made us that way, and God expects us to treat each other that way, so make sure you’re kind to everyone you see!”
this made me think otherwise…
So your revenge is preaching to those who don’t care?
My revenge is pissing people off by posting my harmless message on every post.
So I used the word “God” a couple times in my message. My overall point was about equality. I told people to treat each other with respect, not to be christians.
So… someone pissed you off, and to get revenge, you intend to piss others off.
Vicious circle, or would this count as hypocritical because you want people to be respectful, but your posting this with the intention of pissing them off, which is not respectful.
Besides, I am not pissed. I just find bible thumpers mildly annoying.
I’m not a bible thumper. And yes, if you piss me off, I piss you off back. Equal treatment.
i duno what ur saying im not equal with mike ……..
If you run over a dog in austria, the dog owner has to pay for any damage the dog has done while you hit him with your car
in communist russia, dog runs over you
It’s Soviet Russia, dips**t.
In Communist Russia, you share your car with the dog.
Communism fail.
If he did that to my dog and I saw this conversation I may actually kill him.
God, where to begin with how fake this is…
The stilted dialogue that ranges from familiar to distant? Non-sequitur dialogue shifts whose only point seems to be to set up a punchline? Pointing out needless details that would only resonate with a 3rd-party reader (but that even semi-close friends would be long past bringing up so blatantly)? And nevermind a profound lack of understanding of law-enforcement (4 or 5 cops responding to a dead dog? In a city large enough to have a 19th street? Seriously?).
Love you Facebook, but you’re the one who failed this time.
EXACTLY. It’s so freakin’ obvious. People usually put all important information int a single comment. This conversation flows back and forth like it’s a script.
Like when Family Guy makes those sidejokes always starting with something like ‘Boy, this is worse than that time I [insert crappy joke here]‘ – that kind of 3rd-party reader humor?
Umm thats totally fake… I highly doubt that someone dumb enough to hit a dog and think it’s okay, then broadcast that they did it and describe their vheicle on a public site, would know how to use proper spelling and punctuation.
Ironically… ‘thats’ isn’t a word. Sorry, but you were just begging for it.
What about vheicle?? ;P
Coincidentally, that wasn’t ironic.
1) It’s fake.
2) It’s not a crime so it’s your responsibility to see to the safety of your pets. Police would never waste the time and manpower to investigate something that happens all the f**king time.
3) Everything dies and there’s no such thing as fairness, justice or balance in death so get used to it.
Life is random; people are unfair.
Actually, it IS Mike’s responsibility to be in control of his vehicle at all times. Please check the driving laws. I’m 100% certain.
Sometimes trying to avoid hitting an animal, esp. if it comes out of nowhere which it may or may not have done, can lead to loss of control of your vehicle. I don’t agree with Mike bragging about it, but personally I would rather hit the dog than swerve and hit a tree and possibly get hurt or killed myself. But I do value my own life more than someone’s pet’s, just like if someone’s dog is loose and attacks me and I beat it to death after it bites me, I won’t feel bad for its family. I would never intentionally harm an animal but survival is survival, whether its not getting into a wreck over swerving for a dog or not letting it maul the s**t out of you. Mikes a douchebag but animals are not people and it shouldn’t have been in the road.
sounds to me like he purposefully hit the dog in my opinion. Just look at the comment. Quote “I smoked that motherf**ker. I didn’t think anyone was around….” That is not something someone who was avoiding the dog would say. That is proof right there that it was intentionally done. Though asking after if it was dead kinda says maybe he thought he didn’t hit the dog very hard. He still just admitted that he did hit the dog intentionally.
It’s not something *you* would say. However, someone who uses a different vocabulary (perhaps someone who learned to speak by watching HBO all day because his parents are idiots) might use “smoked” to describe something which was unquestionably killed, or might use the term as an exaggeration to describe anything which might have been hit by his vehicle (ie, “I smoked that trash can”). Because you are a different person, you can’t use the rules which describe how you would speak to accurately infer the intention behind what someone else said.
Sure, this is fake as hell, but the worthwhile point is that you need to be careful about thinking that everyone is just like you. Understanding different perspectives makes the world much easier to deal with.
Wassup guys.
Here, a dog is property, so if you hit one accidentally, you’re responsible for attempting to find the owner so they can file a claim against your insurance (or you can compensate them outright).
So hitting a dog is a crime in the same way hitting someone’s parked car is a crime… and driving off without trying to contact them is a whole *other* crime.
Intentionally hitting them is also a crime as animal cruelty, but proving intent is often difficult.
You mean it’s important to find the owner so you can file a claim against them for the damage their “property” did to your vehicle while their “property” was in the middle of the road.
Hitting a legally parked car is a crime because places where cars can park are not places where cars should be driving. Accidentally hitting a dog in the road is *not* a crime, because dogs are supposed to be confined to the yard (don’t give me BS about how they dig / jump – that’s the dog owner’s fault for not knowing how to confine an animal they selected; somehow I manage to keep thousand+ pound bulls out of the road).
This is not like hitting a parked car, it’s like hitting a TV that someone threw out in front of your car while you drove past. The owner of the TV is responsible for the damage they caused your vehicle, if any, *and* they’re responsible for not keeping their TV out of the f’in road.
Intentionally hitting a dog is animal cruelty, though, and should be punished to the maximum extent.
What an idiot, hopefully someone “smokes that motherf**ker” Mike to.
It isn’t a repeat from Failblog.
It was on lamebook, yes, but as most people don’t read both, and someone could have easily submitted it to both, etc, that does not count.
Especially because they are separate sites which probably don’t check what is on the other.
And like I said, not everyone reads both, most just read one or another.
PS Is “Failbooker” actually associated with failbook or just someone who pretends? If it is actually a failbook person, that’s awesome!!
Hi Marissa!
hella fake, but hillarious!
Mike is a douchebag. I hope someone kicks his ass.
Even if it is fake, it’s still pretty horrible.
Am I just coming back on different days and they haven’t updated their page yet, or has this one been posted like three times? I swear this is the third time it’s been up here.
Takes a real worthless sack of garbage to brag about killing a poor innocent animal. Good terms with the guy or not, I’d have told the owner of that dog anyway. There’s a special place in hell reserved for abusers and murderers like him.
hell doesn’t exist. it’s all a lie. you’ve been brainwashed!
She shouldn’t have let her dog run in the street.
All of a sudden I have a craving for hot dogs
I know what you did last summer
Extra respect points to Russell for saying “would have” instead of “would of”.
Would of is correct! You don’t know anything!!
With a name like “HELP PETA” I would say you are the one who does not know anything.
Basic Rule: Of is a preposition. Do not use of in the place of have after verbs such as could, should, would, might and must.
If this is for real, I PRAY I never have to share air with these two. Especially Mike.
LOL, that’s classic! How the hell could you post that crap in a Facebook feed?
Mike, now that’s a up right AHOLE! Running over a dog! People have NO SHAME, thanks failbook!
OMG that’s some funny s**t after long time
It would be hard to admit this evidence because this would be hearsay. Unless it fits into some exception/exemptions, such as party admission or statement against interest, or else it won’t get in. There is also an authentication issue. There is no proof that Mike actually wrote this thread; as someone could have used Mike’s account. Though, that argument goes more to weight rather than admissibility.
I take it you took the bar exam this week?
An actual lawyer would realize that the fault is on the pet owner here, not the driver, so “suitability of evidence” is irrelevant to a trial which would never happen.
hit and run n. the crime of a driver of a vehicle who is involved in a collision with another vehicle, property or human being, who knowingly fails to stop to give his/her name, license number, and other information as required by statute to the injured party, a witness, or law enforcement officers. If there is only property damage and no other person is present, leaving the information attached to the damaged property may be sufficient, provided the person causing the accident makes a report to the police. Hit and run statutes vary from state to state. It is not a violation of the constitutional protection against self-incrimination to be required to stop and give this information since it is a report and not an admission of guilt. Some hit and run cases are difficult to determine, such as the driver leaves the accident scene to go a block to his/her house or the neighborhood repair garage, and then walks back to the scene.
a dog is a person’s property so it is technically a crime
This is the moment you question what kind of friends you have.
The people who think this is not a crime do realize that you have to report any accident that involves hitting someone else’s property to the police right?
I just love that everyone is all “Boo Mike!” When Russell is only going to turn him in because Mike owes him money. That’s not exactly virtuous either.
Maybe Russell knows that this is not a crime, so he’s going to get the $300 and know that nothing will happen to Mike.
That guy is a f**king douchebag (driver).
I guess he doesn’t know what its like to lose a friend like a dog.
Mark here, go to hell Mike, over.
i love how he says “get some wings at bbw.” im thinking he means buffalo wild wings, BWW or “b-dubs” as we say, and not that hes going to get some wings from either bath and body works or big beautiful women. though i admit, big beautiful women could serve me wings all day long.
I would have sold him out too
Oh my god you people arguing over the post order are idiots. Failbook or whoever submitted the fail (if they are good with Photoshop) re-orders the posts so that it is easier to read / more funny. You get the background of the story through the conversation first, and then the “punch line” (Mike wanting to re-paint his car) last. I do it all the time when I submit stuff to failbook.
4 or 5 cop cars for a dog? Seriously? Around here they rarely send that many for a person. Makes one wonder what kind of dog they had in mind.
Finally, someone else worked that one out! My neighbour was beating on his gf the other night and it took an hour to get 1 cop car to the appartments.
Obviously a fake.
Depends on the municipality. Small town cops have nothing better to do, and it sounds like the woman was hysterical and WITNESSED him callously destroying her pet (who may have gotten loose, or, she was stupid and allowed him to run loose). I mean, she had a description of his truck.
STUPID
oh for christs sake-its a dog
one less yappin’ flea-ridden mutt
good riddence if you ask me
I hope you get hit by a truck, and I hope it hurts. One less loud-mouth, dumbass waste of matter, good riddence if you ask me.
What a f**king white trash piece of s**t. I hope this f**ker gets his throat slit. Wow you are big f**king man murdering a dog in your white trash truck..f**ker is lucky it wasnt my dog.
wow… that was articulate…
If the dog is not in your fenced yard or on a leash, it’s a road hazard.
In most states, hitting anything (including a pet) is covered by some unsafe driving law. No matter the situation, the driver is always at fault when something is hit.
I’m going toss a brick in front of your car, since it’ll be your fault for hitting my brick.
No matter the situation, people always know less about the law than they think.
I foresee suffering in Mike’s future, hilarious suffering. (Hopefully he’ll run from the cops, go to prison, and drop the soap)
White trash, they feel no empathy (for any species), but they still feel pain!
I don’t care if this post is fake or not, I hope this guy gets hit by a Black Dodge.
of course this is fake……..
Oh no goggy!
LMFAO, don’t care if it’s real or not (I mean, okay, I hope that no dogs were really killed by truck driving douche bags)…but made my day! So funny!
So glad the friend had a grudge. If someone is told they killed a dog and their response is “yeah, I smoked that motherf**ker” I think they should be run over with their own vehicle. Repeatedly.
Um, retard Mike?? Guess what, it IS criminal to hit a dog with your car. Especially when you say things like, “yeah, I smoked that motherf**ker”. Which essentially says you did it on purpose. That’s ANIMAL ABUSE. That IS a crime. I hope you, at the least, recieve a fine for an exorbitant amount of money.
Hello.
You realize therefore significantly in the case of this topic, produced me individually believe it from numerous varied angles. Its like women and men aren’t interested except it’s one thing to do with Woman gaga! Your personal stuffs great. At all times handle it up!