So yesterday, Sarah Palin stirred up a pretty heated debate by using the wrong word over Twitter. And when she got called out on it, she took to Facebook to strike back. Unfortunately for her, the internet returned fire, flagging her message as hate speech.
Submitted by: Unknown
-
-
-
Copy & paste this:
That’s not hate speach. This is hate speach
“I hope sarah Palin Falls off a cliff into a vat of sulferic acid and gets eaten by crodidiles with aids because she’s a dumb f**king slut who doesn’t even take care of her own kids.”
Wow. Read the dictionary much?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech
Rich, white Christian neocon Republicans aren’t a “protected class” under civil rights law, because it isn’t necessary. Saying “I wish the KKK would assassinate that dirty Communist Kenyan in the White House” is hate speech. It’s racially motivated, and the threat of subsequent action is very real. As opposed to the gay crocodile/acid/cliff scenario aimed at a polarizing public figure because she aspires to the highest office in the land. Not because she’s Alaskan or whatever your point was.
Hate speech is not the frustrated revenge fantasy of a marginalized, powerless individual. It is an act of intimidation and threat by a dominant person or group.
If you’d ever been on the receiving end of hate speech, or a hate crime, you would know the difference.
Gay Crocodiles? noone said they were gay, did you assume they were gay because they have AIDs? tut-tut
Free speech is a right, but some people lack the common sense not to say stupid, idiotic garbage.
While I can see both sides of the argument clearly as something not black and white, I hate the fact that the two towers site is now called ‘Hallowed ground’. it is in no way, shape or form, even remotely religious. It promoted a lot of things the bible goes against (gambling for one, with the whole stock exchange thing. You could never know if you were going to get rich or lose it all short of admittedly hazy plans).
I really do feel that this mosque should be built, as a sign that it’s in the past. We know it happened, and we know who was responsible, and it obviously wasn’t the general Islamic faith. having that Mosque there would prove that we as Americans would be able to get over the fact that we are stupid, fat, ugly, narcissistic, stereotyping, superstitious pigs, and be able to put that aside long enough to make peace with a generally all good faith with similar values.
And Regina (earlier comment) is entirely right over the idea that Christianity, in many of it’s denominations and forms have caused widespread damage and caused mass extinction. The problem there is, it isn’t just one denomination (say Catholic in pure example, crusades and that) it’s most of the older ones, and a few new ones. Instead of being able to count on our fingers the ‘bad’ denominations, we are counting on our fingers the ‘good’ denominations. (and by good, / bad I mean by general moral standing point of giving to the sick and poor, not killing everyone who disagrees and starting pointless wars).
Ending this final rant, the Mosque is in no way an attack on Americans or the Christian faith, its just a f**king building where they pray and do their thing. It’s against human rights to refuse them that!
“I hate the fact that the two towers site is now called ‘Hallowed ground’. it is in no way, shape or form, even remotely religious. It promoted a lot of things the bible goes against (gambling for one, with the whole stock exchange thing.)”
The Economy is America’s God
Ain’t that the truth. Maybe they should put a giant statue of a Golden Calf there.
Rite on the mark you and the above comment hell yeah
everything you say is true, but my reservations.. I has them
You DO know that Stock exchange isn’t exactly gambling right? Yes, there is luck involved, but for the most part people do extensive research and strategy to decide what they should or should not buy.
1. Sarah Palin is a dumb as a stone.
2. She can not throw a stone 2 city blocks (600 feet), I do not know anyone that can, so her desire to protect Ground Zero from stone throwing Muslims 600 feet away is already fulfilled.
3. Sarah Palin is also an idiot.
F**k Sarah Palin.
There’s already a mosque right near where the Towers stood. What’s the problem with adding another one?
Also, there’s a Shinto shrine right near the USS Arizona memorial. Life is full of coincidences that people need to stop making big deals out of.
How about worrying about the McDonald’s that’s conveniently placed next to the Bally’s instead of where a church or temple or mosque are located.
People just need to understand the difference between the 99.999% of Muslims who are generally peaceful and kind people, and the .001% of Muslims who interpreted the teachings of their religion the wrong way and caused the death and destruction we saw on September 11th, 2001, or supported those that caused it. The beliefs of a very small part of a group do not affect the beliefs of the whole. Remember, the Ku Klux Klan and the members of the Westboro Baptist Church all consider themselves Christians. Are the rest of the billion-plus people who follow the Christian or Catholic faith persecuted as a whole for the horrible deeds these two groups have committed?
They’re Christian why would they be their ” the only right religion” after all
I think Deuteronomy 24:16 says it all, “Fathers shall not be put to death for their sons, nor shall sons be put to death for their fathers; everyone shall be put to death for his own sin.” We all need to try and stop judging people just because of what others of the same group might have done. If this isn’t paranoia than I don’t know what is.
would sarah palin have a problem with it if it was a church, or a gun store?
What would have happened if she became president……
She would have been shot for being an idiot?
sarah palin should be shot
First of all, Regina is dead on the money.
To say that building a Muslim mosque so close to ground zero is wrong, leads to the logical progression that all Muslims believe in the fanatical ideology of the 911 hijackers. This is hate speech. I don’t think it can be more obvious. Muslim and terrorist are NOT the same thing. 911 had nothing to do with American Muslims, it had everything to do with foreign terrorists living in America. To say that these American Muslims are being disrespectful, is implying that they have some real association with the 911 terrorists.
Let me show you one snippit of exactly what she means, and if you think I am twisting her words, by all means please re-read the second last paragraph in its entirety. It says exactly the same thing.
Sarah Palin: “I agree with…a New York resident who said: ‘…I think it is…audacious…for them to build a mosque…specifically so that they could be in proximity to where the atrocity happened’. ”
Sarah Palin actually believes that the whole mosque and Islamic center is being built out of spite for Americans. Who is this mysterious “they” who are building the mosque? Who does she think is going to be going to this mosque? Who is this mosque being built for? NY residents!
Firstly she wants deny them the right to practice their religion in this area. How is that fair and tolerent?
Secondly, she is implying that all Muslims who live in downtown Manhattan either already support 911 attacks, or will be indoctrinated to support them by Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf. She denounces the controversial things he has said… and even if her claims were absolutely correct (which is totally preposterous) don’t the ‘evil terrorist NY Muslims’ have the right to say whatever they want? To stir up angst and hate against whomever they want? This is America after all. There is the right to free speech. American citizens are granted the right to say anything! Its this very fundamental constitutional right which is allowing her to breed biggotry with her hateful words.
In Canada, we all have the right to free speech. We do NOT have the right to incite hate. Hate speech is a criminal offense, (something Anne Coulter couldn’t get her head around) and all the banter about this planned Islamic center would be condemned as such.
“All Americans must recognize that the face of terror is not the true faith — face of Islam. Islam is a faith that brings comfort to a billion people around the world. It’s a faith that has made brothers and sisters of every race. It’s a faith based upon love, not hate.”
President George W. Bush Holds Round table with Arab and Muslim-American Leaders
Afghanistan Embassy, Washington, D.C.
September 10, 2002
Why does everyone assume that anyone who is Muslim is evil && plans to kill all Christians?
No. ALL religions have extremists, and they always will. Just because we see more in the news about Muslim extremists than Christian (I wonder why), does NOT mean its any worse. We should stop hating on the entire Muslim community, because MOST of them are just normal people. If you want to hate a whole group of people based on work by psychopathic groups intent on controlling the world’s religion, go ahead and hate everyone on Earth, except maybe athiests. ((Not quite sure if they have extremist groups, but hey: anything could happen.)) I’m a Christian, but I am more than well aware of the events in Waco, for example.
Just my 2 cents. =)
I am from the UK and may be a bit numb to US politics, but generally at sites of tragedy and loss of life people either build memorials, or leave the site as it is. Is this some sort of “turn the dead child’s room into a gym” sort of thing for America?
Why are they even contemplating building anything there… at least make it a park or a fountain…
9/11 was an inside job…come on people ..open your eyes. Dont stay stupid forvere…seek the truth…..
Peace to You All.
*cough* Crusades *cough*
Now if people would realize the similarities between the two religions, and that this “war” has been going on for centuries (yes “war” – whether you consider it one or not, at least one side considers it a war). This entire conflict has been perpetuated by extremists on both sides for hundreds of years and it’s really pretty silly when you get right down to it.
“A religious war is just people killing each other over who has the better imaginary friend.”
(Which, in this case, is the same imaginary friend if I remember correctly.)
Great quote. Maybe I’ll start a church that worships my smart-aleck groundhog who plays guitar…
The problem is not with the mosque, but the people behind it. It is rumored (according to trusty Wikipedia) that the Inman (Priest/Pastor) has ties to radical/extremist Islamic groups. It would be like a ‘Christian’ group blowing up an abortion clinic, then builds their church down the street.
where’s the proof that 9/11 was perpetrated by islamic extremists? as far as I know we’re all still just taking the MSM’s word for it. All the planes and all the bodies of the terrorists were vaporized but several passports survived the fireball? that’s our proof? Apply a hint of logic to the official story and watch it unravel. This is all designed to breed hate, divide, conquer. How about let’s be smart and not feed into it.
I think it’s pretty obviously biased. If it were Buddhist extremists that bombed it, we’d resist a Buddhist Shrine, and so on and so forth with other religions; but I have a feeling that if it was Christian extremists, the mass opinion would have no problem building a church there. We hold accountable an entire race for the actions of select few. We as Americans get that too, thought worldwide as “stupid” and “arrogant” because our public face is just that, and we fiercely defend that many of us are intelligent and…well, humble isn’t word used often anymore, sadly. However, we seem to forget we’ve stood in the middle of this target and throw others onto it. If anything should be built there, I think it should be something that celebrates all cultures and all religions of the world, harmoniously shown together under one building and inviting many people of these various viewpoints to see how similar we are in the end. But that’s just my opinion ^_~.
Jews did 9/11. End of the discussion.
TLDR
(Facepalm) What is WRONG with Failbook? Do they honestly not realize that this will cause a massive flame war?
tl;dr
The answer is soooo simple. Let them build the mosque. Encourage it to be as lavish as possible. Then crash a drone into it.
I’m no racist, far from, seeing I myself am 1/2 Turkish 1/2 German
but building a Mosque on Ground Zero…
That would be like Putting a Jesus cross (a big one) at Mekka near the Cube.
There are some things that shouldn’t be done.
No, it wouldn’t.
The twin towers were never a place of worship, or Christian holy ground.
I’m sorry, but this is just ignorant. I believe that every body has the right to free speech, so it doesn’t really bother me that much what she said. What bothers me is all these “good christians” not being willing to forgive. It talks in the bible about turning the other cheek and forgiving the people who hurt us. I can understand why people have issues with this, but come on, be the bigger person and practice what you preach.
I wonder if muslims have awful stereotypes about us white people.
boy do they. especially the black mulsims in america. i have literally heard song being taught to children about them. terrible words, and they sing them like its a nursery rhyme
I don’t think this is hate speech, that sounds more like an opinion. She doesn’t say “I don’t want a mosque because it’s muslim, or foreigner, or else”. Meh. Maybe I’m too dumb and I don’t get it.
NOBODY can pronounce nuclear… there are actually two different pronunciations for it. Look it up, I did when I was unsure what the ‘proper’ way was.
And look, oh, she’s an idiot because she used a word that doesn’t exist and/or can’t pronounce something ‘properly’. Because, of course, NO ONE else has EVER done that… right? No, of course not. (don’t take this as a ‘defending Palin’ thing, take this more as a ‘thumbing my nose at everyone for being ‘mad’ at her for an incredibly stupid reason’ thing.)
As far as the mosque… no, I don’t think ANY religious organization should have a place there, except for possibly a ‘reflection garden’ or something of the like. Let people grieve and remember in their own way, and don’t make walls between them, making it an ‘us and them’ thing.
Oh, she’s stupid, all right, but it is for much larger reasons than mere inability to pronounce a specific word.
Also. *Devours with Tyranid swarms*
^ this. i agree with you 1000%
Just to put it in perspective…
It’s not “there,” it’s over two blocks away. In an abandoned Burlington Coat Factory. I understand there’s a strip club that’s just about as close to the trade center. There’s a betting parlor that’s the same distance. There’s a Payless, a Burger King, a Pronto Pizza. A Hookah Lounge. A McDonalds. A Men’s Wearhouse. All those things are as close or closer than the proposed mosque.
St. Paul’s is way closer — across the street rather than several blocks away. If a church is ok to have in the neighborhood, right across from Ground Zero, why not a mosque? (I guess you could argue that the church is grandfathered in — Washington prayed there — but if someone wanted to build a new church in the Equinox two blocks from the trade center…I kind of doubt anyone would protest.)
Look, if these things were AT the trade center…ok, I could see the argument — let’s not build any religious buildings on that land. But they’re not — they’re just in the general area. And I don’t understand trying to make all of downtown NY a muslim-free zone — I can’t get behind that.
^ oh, so well said!
I wonder if Palin … or most of the posters on this forum … even know where the bloody mosque would supposedly go in relation to the WTC site.
Here’s a hint … it’s NOT on the site. It’s a couple of blocks away.
win
true…
Good one!
+10 points for smart comment
Which payback are you talking about? Our government doing the killing or in your warped view 9/11, Khobar Towers, Cole, etc. Go give yourself an equal serving of your hate.
Why?
1. There’s an underserved muslim community in the neighborhood.
2. Land in the neighborhood is both expensive and hard to come by. Because it is a historic area, nothing can be torn down except in rare cases.
3. Because this happens to be a Burlington Coat Factory in poor condition, it’s a rare chance to tear down and build new in the area — without having the last name Trump.
It’s not to be “controversial.” It’s not out of a lack of “respect,” and it has nothing to do with being near ground zero — heck, it’s not even all that close. You can’t SEE the trade center from there — and couldn’t even when it was up — because there’s two blocks of buildings in the way.
Stop, Bob. You’re trying to explain NYC to people who’s notions of it are informed solely by re-runs of Law and Order and what their parents told them it was like in the ’70′s and ’80′s.
End of story is that this is a local issue being used as political fodder. Is anyone really surprised that Sarah Palin is the one serving up the hay?
You can’t SEE the trade center from anywhere
pants! my prev comment was for Kat’s comment
I can. I think the entire US should be a Muslim-free zone.
the church and all of those other places were there *before* 9/11, weren’t they? Your point is invalid.
agreed, 100%
Ok, the people building the mosque are not the same people who attacked us on 9/11. All Muslim are NOT THE SAME! That’s the point that a lot of people fail to understand. “Muslim” does not equal “extremist” or “terrorist” any more than “Christian” does.
Sarah Palin claims not to be intolerant, but she, too, fails to see the difference. This is a country founded on tolerance.
Also, if you think about it, Osama bin Laden kind of was created by the US. We were all hunky dory with him when he was fighting against Russia – in fact, if it weren’t for the US training bin Laden and giving him weapons, the Taliban never could have defeated Russia in the first place. So the reason he’s the threat that he is, is because we trained him!
Nope. The church was — but, as noted, no one would complain if another church was built equally as close. The others — like all similar places — change over pretty frequently.
But even if they didn’t…is the Burger King now a historic landmark because it was in the general area of the Trade Center? Because I’ve got to tell you, it’s a pretty crappy Burger King — if we’re going to declare a fast food place sacred, can’t we at least pick one that doesn’t suck?
You’re saying the shops haven’t changed in the last decade? Seriously?
Well worded, but I disagree on your point.
The problem isn’t the mosque itself, as Muslims are free to worship in their own way all across America. The problem is that it is specifically meant to be built very close to the site of a devastating attack made by the radical extremists who just happen to pray to the same God. You would think that, the people in charge of the building of this new Mosque would be sensitive to that issue and not build so close? Thinking people must agree that this is in bad taste, and that they should be respectful of the memory of the people who died there.
I agree completely with you, Melissa! It annoys me when people think muslim=terrorist or vice versa. On the whole, most muslims are quite peaceful people who don’t want war or death. Extremists come in any religion and it’s unfair to hold it exclusively to Islam.
Before I further express my opinion, first I’ll say that I’m not American so I don’t exactly know of the cultural significance. I would have thought that it would be insensitive to build anything on Ground Zero. Whether it’s a mosque, a church or a Starbucks, isn’t it sort of degrading a memorial site?
Thanks, Demeter!
The thing that bugs me about this is, they’re not building the mosque ON Ground Zero. It’s going to be very close TO Ground Zero, but not on the actual site. They are actually building on the site right now, but they’re building two new buildings and some memorials. I think that’s fine – the best revenge we can exact against the terrorists is to rebuild what they destroyed and show that they haven’t beaten us. But people are getting up in arms believing that the mosque is going to be smack dab in the middle of the site, and they’re wrong. I think building a house of worship (of any religion) on the site would be degrading, as it would be an insult to anyone not of that faith who died there that day. But the fact remains that the mosque won’t be there. People need to pay attention.
thats f**ked up..just saying.
Michelle, I think you are a fool.
Love, peace and chicken grease make the world go round.
Understanding makes for a happier populace, though the populace is rarely ever happy because everyone’s understanding is different.
Tolerance is, at least, a start.
You sure showed them.
Dumbass
Oh? And what about the religious freedom that this country was founded on? I’m afraid that your comment only shows how much of a bigoted, closed-minded fool you are.
Regardless, do you think it’s a good idea or a bad idea? Make a realistic list of benefits and drawbacks, because, at this point, the benefits of building it in that location are not so great, and there are a LOT of potential drawbacks, including serious possible vandalism and garnering yet more scorn and intolerance from non-Muslim co-residents.
Benefits of deciding NOT to build a mosque there at this point are actually more promising.
It doesn’t really matter the technical distance because it’s become a point of debate already.
Ah, thank you for clearing up my confusion about building “on” Ground Zero. As I said, I’m not American so I didn’t know anything about all this fuss except for what was written on the Sarah Palin thing. Okay, now that I know that all this panic is because a mosque is being built in the general vicinity of Ground Zero I think I can say “get over it” to those people who are freaking out about it.
And maybe you’re right. But whether anyone likes it or not, thinks it’s justified or not, it has become publicly controversial and the nature of the beast has now changed. So even though there may have been good, practical reasons to build a mosque there, it’s probably not such a good idea anymore. If they build a mosque there, which do you think it will accomplish more of – A. Effectively serve the Muslim community of that area or B. Be controversial and create more problems for the local Muslim community.
Not saying I like it, but hey…
And really, I can see other people taking issue to this other than Palin. Our political culture is becoming so Politician-celebrity centric – it’s a huge “he said, she said,” and both sides play. So yeah, I’m not surprised either. In any way. But now that so many people have voiced that it would offend them/be a slap in the face, bulldozing ahead with the a plan, regardless of their original intention, really is like a big “F-U we don’t care what you think.” It’s not in their best interest… you can hate people for making this thing an issue when you don’t think it should be, but moot point much? It’s already an issue. T’ain’t no going back.
What kind of church? Catholic, Baptist, Anglican, Methodist, Presbyterian, the list goes on and on and on, and if you pick one a lot of the others will throw a tantrum. The Mosque gets the land because they paid for it, if that is changed on account of them being the wrong religion, that’s discriminating and insulting to all the Americans who aren’t Christians. We count just as much as they do.
Yeah… There were no crusades that killed thousands of Americans on American soil and then tried to build churches on those sites in the name of the religion that killed those Americans. Islam is doing just that.
ok, sigh, you just got styx’d
Here is some evidence sigh.
How many Catholic Churches are near the site of the Alfred P. Murray Building in Oklahoma City? Timothy McVey was an Irish Catholic.
Uh, you realise that means a church shouldn’t be built there either, seeing as Christians pray to the same god? You know Allah is just the arabic word for God and that arabic speaking Christians and Jews call God allah as well?
How close is too close? Two blocks is a pretty long way away.
If they had initially planned to build it next door, everyone would be demanding that it be built elsewhere and saying “couldn’t they just build it a couple blocks away?!”
But it IS a couple blocks away, so everyone is saying “couldn’t they just go a little further — like five blocks?!”
Of course, if it was five blocks away, everyone would be saying “couldn’t they just get out of downtown — maybe go to Brooklyn?!”
So you’re not counting all of the Native Americans that were killed by European immigrants? And we’ll just ignore all of the churches that missionaries built on their holy grounds.
You mean surrender to ignorance, because it might become violent? Sure, that’s one option…
The benefits of this particular site are substantial. There’s a substantial need for a mosque in the area, but it’s hard to find a location in downtown NYC — land is both expensive and highly-restricted by historical preservation requirements. This building is abandoned and the historical boards are willing to grant approval because of its condition. If there’s ever going to be a mosque downtown, this is the place for it to go.
I’ve never understood what the zone of muslim exclusion is supposed to be. Two blocks away, with no line of sight to the Trade Center, is apparently still too close. So how about five? Ten? I guess muslims that work in the area could walk ten blocks for prayer, as a “compromise” with those who want them driven out entirely. But can you point to a building that fits the bill AND is far enough away not to offend the sensibilities of bullies? I can’t.
You’re right that proceeding means ignoring those that voice irrational, angry, and possibly bigoted objections based on their own political ambitions. But I think we learned this week with the USDA employee that giving in to that sort of objection merely means being pushed further, having the lies grow bolder, and never having your name cleared.
Let’s say that the muslim community said “alright, we agree, we’re pariahs, so we’ll not build downtown. We’ll go without a mosque, because we don’t want you to hate us.” Do you think Fox News and their “friends” would praise the kindly muslims for their cooperation? No, they’d continue to be demonized — and this “win” would only encourage future demonization and attempts to push further. You’re not going to win any friends by accepting the ridiculous screeds and irrational demands of bullies.
Instead, build the thing and show everyone that it is peaceful. If someone wants to come report on it as a controversy, let them come — let them walk the two blocks, come inside, and claim that it’s somehow meant to be anti-American or a “slap in the face.”
Congratulations, you have just Won!
The Game
Sorry, i call foul. You won nothing.
You’ve assumed that he agreeable to a Christian church being planted on a ground that might be sacred and offensive to others. Not good practice in any form.
Thanks for telling the truth
…speaking of hate speech. But there’s always a double standard with you commie types.
Why build a mosque there? To prove that God’s love for man is greater than man’s lunacy? To show that beauty and art can conquer hatred?
Frankly, the perfect thing to put on the site isn’t some memorial. Build it up with houses of worship from all of the world’s faiths. Put an art museum there too.
If, as you claim, this place is sacred, let us treat it as truly such, and establish it as a place for worship.
+5000
You just made my day good sir. I applaud you and your open minded outlook.
Religious intolerance is everywhere, and when I heard about the plans for the mosque, I thought it was a FANTASTIC idea.
Muslims aren’t all that violent. Sure, there are terrorist and purist organizations that like to link themselves with Islam. Did you ever stop to wonder where the inspiration for the KKK’s duds came from?
In addition, though, this is probably one of the pest publicity stunts you could DO to that area around the trade center. If the USA really wants to put out doubts that its most visible parts right now are tolerant, even accepting, this is the place and the way to do it. In fact, I’d go one step further and encourage its future congregation to get involved in neighborhood improvement programs like church and temple youth groups are wont to do.
Vandalism will happen. I think anyone that didn’t think so from the outset would be delirious, at best, and in an altered state at worst.
Actually, anyone who doubts that Muslims can be civil should go and attend a prayer session at a mosque or at least talk to a Muslim clergy, I have no idea what they are called. One thing that I’m pretty sure won’t happen is that you will be harassed or injured. After all, sharing is caring.
Lin -> retarded
Lin -> 100% correct
What I’m amazed at is the wording of this poll. It makes it sound as if Palin is somehow propagating hate speech. Sure, let’s call Palin a hating homophobe racist Islamophobic republitard wacko while closing our eyes to the real threat of radical Islam. Liberals love finding hate speech where there is none and completely ignoring it where it really exists. We all know what I’m talking about (unless you only watch MSNBC). Liberals only attack those who don’t fight back. (Case in point: liberals’ treatment of Christianity versus their treatment of Islam.) A writer I would recommend highly to anyone, liberal or conservative, or anything else, really, is Mark Steyn. He is a very a prolific author and an insightful journalist who not only successfully predicted the societal collapse of Greece, but is also warning us of the death of Europe (which is something even the liberal lapdog media companies are beginning to realize).
And conservatives love trying to prove that liberals are tree hugging commie wackjobs whenever they can. We all know what I’m talking about (unless you only watch FOX News).
I agree that Palin was not using hate speech in this case. Oddly enough she’s absolutely right if she’s correct about the Imam condoning the attacks on the US on 09/11. It’s not a mosque thing, it’s just not right to have people who agreed with the attacks to actually be allowed a permanent place on the site of the attacks. It’s an insult to the dead and their families.
But, gneekie boy, you’re a freaky weird nutcase.
Just a minor fact, the KKK’s outfits have roots in European religion, specifically classical. Just think druids.
Besides, Christians are allowed to build a god damned church any where they want, and a Muslim mosque isnt allowed to be there.
Excuse your f**king fatass, that is the exact same thing you f**king Muslims are doing to the Christians in Islamic countries so shut your f**king mouth and get out of Christian-ruled countries.
Um, Ridley, what’s your PS all about?
Lebanon Twin towers?? Lebanese men, women and children were killed first? wth?
Besides, what does Americans killing Lebanese people and destroying the “Lebanon twin towers” have to do with Al-Quaida and 9/11?
Wow; issues much?
The U.S. is supposed to be built on a foundation of freedom; freedom of worship, freedom of speech, freedom of religion. NOT just christianity. ANY religion.
Islamic ruled countries are not run by our constitution. They have their own rules in their own countries. They do not permit other religions to be established there. We expect people to follow our laws if they want to be here; why should we expect to be treated any differently by another nation?
Our rules here are freedom of religion; not freedom of just OUR religion.
So, to get in the spirit of things, shut your f**king fatass and learn about other cultures, not just your parent’s basement.
Good lord, you nearly eclipse the OP in idiocy.
Correction, Line 3:
*There’re
I as a muslim disagree with him, what he said was wrong. Lebanon thing involved a small group of americans(the army) killing civiallians, and those that died in twin towers were also civillians, there according to Islam twin towers was wrong, and the attackers will be punished in hell, according to Islam