Submitted by: Chris Wilkinson via Submission Page
-
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Maybe She Is Studying Alcoholism? | Capitalization Or Quotes Are Very Helpful Next »
« Previous Maybe She Is Studying Alcoholism? | Capitalization Or Quotes Are Very Helpful Next »
Submitted by: Chris Wilkinson via Submission Page
Good job, dumbass.
Now was the colorful language really necessary?
**Colourful
both are except-able genius
actually, both are acceptable…genius…
**Acceptable
Asshat.
FAIL spelling nazi + FAIL comment = WIN.
actually two wrongs don’t make a right
but two fails make a win so your right and wrong
You’re*
American English is to British English what Fail is to Win.
both are essentially humorous and therefore cool….???
Humourous? Heh.
Yeah, I did that on purpose………okay so I am lying…. I didn’t even realize that the word could be spelled differently. Ironic though.
Frank, check your facts. American English is actually more proper than British English. Read Bill Brysons Made In America ISBN 0-380-71381-0. K THX BYE!
I’m sorry, but how can American English be more proper than British English when it was us English folk who created the language then brought it to America?
Brits are just as capable of making slang as Americans.
^ Win
lol Caitlin true. Just because they created it doesn’t mean they don’t have the ability to eff it up any less than Americans do.
Effing epic!
It should be,
“… when it was we* English folk
not “… when it was us” English folk
Thanks!!
It’s us. See, object pronouns go AFTER the verb.
No it’s we. The verb here is “created”. “We created the language”, not “us created English.”
*headache*
idiot
Wee English Folk…
Yep, that’s how I’m hearing it from now on.
Because, as addressed in Made In America (the book Blablajeah mentioned), modern American English is closer to the language that the brits “invented” than is modern British English, because America was isolated enough from Britain that while the language was being revolutionized (or really just minorly changed) in Europe, it changed even less in America.
It’s not “more proper”, it’s “more properer” and anyway it’s closer to the English of several hundred years ago, so just more unevolved, more backward, less modern.
Okay, really? Are you guys seriously arguing over different versions of English? How pathetic.
This is probably the most intelligent comment so far.
Not as pathetic as just adding a comment to say how pathetic it is.
thats a win right there
HAHA
LOL. And Canadian English is to British and American English what metre is to centimetre and kilometre.
European trolls are the worse.
The “worst” not “worse”.
Arrrggghhh! Yeah you’re right. But still, European trolls are the worst.
What are you people talking about? Illiterate black trolls are by far the worst.
LMMFAO! Win!
LMIBTAO!
You do realized you troll’ed while attempting to call someone else a troll? And I’m not just mentioning the fact that you pwned your own sentence, that can happen to anyone. But to generalize some stereotype to an entire continent… obvious troll is obvious =)
colour = British English
color = American English, there is a difference
When somebody is as retarded as this, eff yeah!
The colorful language is auto-set. Facebook via iPhone or iTouch supplies the colorful text xD
Yes.
OMG, SHUT UP ALL OF YOU GRAMMAR NAZIS!!!
NOW IS NOT THE TIME!!!
And besides, That’s my job.
dont u mean spelling nazi? grammar seemed fine to me
seriously put a ” ‘ ” in your “dont”
Not to mention the “u” and the lack of capitilisation and punctuation.
Well there is a T in that’s that you wrote and it is not supposed to be capitalized.
And you misspelled “Grammar” in your own name.
And why use three exclamation points when one would do?
I would like to commemorate this as the single most intelligent conversation i have ever seen on any multimedia website.
I second that notion.
I can’t resist! Grammar Nazis: Heil Apostrophe!
You capitalized “That’s” when it wasn’t at the beginning of a sentence.
This should be on failbog under ” Fundamentalist fail.”
Yeah, there is more than one kind of Christian. I know the comments are full of snippy things and correcting people but there is nothing in the fake or not fail up there that indicates a specific kind of Christian.
Fundamentalist is a specific descriptor.
It’s like saying you should tag a picture of an otter under “seal” because they’re both water borne mammals.
A fundamentalist would be way more likely to get a lot more angry over this fake situation. If this wasn’t fake my best guess would be Baptist or Evangelical. But it is, like a lot of failbook stuff. Fake.
This is the fakest crap I’ve ever seen.
I really wish people would stop faking thier failbooking. This is obviously staged.
Agreed. It’s obviously faked. Not even funny.
I know, I hate it when this happens
Right, ’cause neither of these two people would want to take a screenshot if it was real…
These posts need to be looked over before they get voted onto the site.
Agreed
More like.. Who the hell actually calls their son “son”?
I call my son “son” when he is being disrespectful or I’m getting onto him about something. Durr.
the religious right?
liberal trolls?
the religious right liberal trolls?
Durr I’m sorry you never had a very good family life.
The religious right would be conservative, not liberal, trolls.
I know, I was simply putting the two together as a way of compromising
compromising fail
Entire thread FAIL
FAKE AND GHEY
um i dont know what a ghey is but if u were trying to say GAY its spelled g-a-y
Do you not know how to spell a simple three letter word?
He most likely intended to spell it like that.
Damn!
HA! Who cares if it’s fake, it’s still funny.
no it’s not.
yeah it is
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Nice one!
fake, and not facebook???
Agree on fake. Close enough to Facebook though…
Texting is close to Facebook since when?
It’s the facebook app on the iPhone.
Are you stupid? Thats the texting screen on the iphone.
No, I have an iPod Touch and when you go on chat it looks like that, Re-think your name when you post like that.
STAGED!
Wow. I agree fake. Still funny though. Lots of people call their son’s son though. That’s fer real. I dated a guy and his mom always said ‘son’ to him.My mother does it to my brother as well. Specially when he’s in trouble. Lolz.
‘sons’, not ‘son’s’
You should also use “for” and “Especially” as long as we’re patrolling for errors…and insert a space after that fifth sentence
dude people are so annyoing on this site. every single post people are screaming fake.
I was just thinking the same thing.
who gives a s**t if its fake? Movies are fake and people still pay to see them.
Willful suspension of disbelief, people!
Faaaaaake, dude.
…oh.
So? When I’m watching a movie, I expect that to be fake, and I’m not disappointed. When I come here I expect real-life trolls, not a fake. It’s just ruining the expectation.
Because you expect everything on the internet to be real?
I have much to teach you.
get him to /b/!
NO, EYE-BLECH PLZ!
Srsly now, that’s why I come here and not to /b/, this is supposed to have some truthful content… Well, that and the fact that if I see another Pedobear-chasing-pink-haired-girl gif, Iz going postal
I too have an iPhone and have genuinely made this mistake several times!
I wish the messaging would revert back to the inbox automatically rather than show the last conversation – so easy to get mixed up!
Stupid religiouspeople think “god” will help them somehow get real and embrace the logic of science.
see if science will help you cope with an eternal death. Here’s the problem.
True Scientific belief cannot be irrational
True Spiritual belief can be irrational.
God and science can co-exist, however those who cast thier eyes solely on the natural world while only observing those who believe in God through an irrational world will find bitterness wherever God presents his name.
I have “gotten real” I am captivated by the truths in science, and I put my trust in God through Jesus’ example.
Eternity is inevitable, and it’s something you need to wrap your head around.
*applause*
Here’s the flaw in your well-drawn speech: I can prove a rock exists, I can prove it was created by a certain kind of magma, in certain pres/temp conditions. I however, can not prove some nekkid dude died for some homoerotic stuff I would do 2000 years later. It’s just not playing at the same level – or as you stated, it’s irrational =)
ha ha ha, love it!
What’s your point? Go look up the definitions of “faith” and “believe” -it doesn’t need to be proven. I can prove you’re an ass, but what good does that do?
He was being funny, you are being mean. What good do your rude comments do?
Oh right, I forgot…it is perfectly acceptable to resort to childish name-calling when you don’t agree with someone.
and you are being sarcastic, which is a perfect blend of funny and mean
Thanks for showing me that Cheezburguer Network comments can be from people who still understand what funniness and irony is =)
You need to believe to see, not see to believe. That is your problem right there.
I’m pretty sure that belief does not solve a chainsaw to the corneas.
Hey Lizard King. Were you there when the rock was created? Were we here when Jesus was alive? Can we be sure of anything? No. stfu.
If we can’t be sure of anything, there is no use trying to make the point that he may be wrong, because he also may be right.
Oh, and saying “Were we here when Jesus was alive?” contradicts your statement that we can’t be sure of anything, because the way you worded that, you are sure that Jesus existed.
just about any historyian will agree that Jesus existed. There’s more accurate evidence for Christ being alive than Julius Caesar.
Uhm… no, not really. And even if there was a guy named Jesus living around that time (which there really isn’t any evidence for) there’s almost 0 chance he was the son of God. We still don’t have any evidence for a deity in the first place.
Actually, there is evidence of him being alive, however there is no proof that he performed miracles or did anything extaordinary. He preached about someone, but for all we know the church could be worshipping a psycho who had brain problems.
And no im not religious at all.
This is a stupid fight, but their is no proof against Jesus being the son of God either
Whose proof?
do some research, ask someone knowledgeable…..preferrably a historian
Religion without Science is blind, Science without religion is lame(lame in this case meaning “unable to walk”).
I don’t see the problem. When I die, I’m dead for good.
Why don’t you accept that just because you don’t know the answer to a question doesn’t mean that some supernatural deity must be behind it? Throughout history, people have claimed, “I don’t know how this works, therefore God did it.” Wind, fire, day & night, reproduction, diseases, the sun, planets, stars — all of these are things that were once explained by mystical superstition but are now well-understood. Those superstitions have been proven wrong over and over again as we have continued to understand the world around us through science.
tl;dr
Troll harder next time.
GUAHAHA you are awesome :’D
I’ve heard some people say that there is nothing that matters more than you own personal understanding of death. This, to me, is not true. We can love another more than we love ourselves. A child, a lifelong lover, or perhaps a parent, all can find thier ways to us in which we find a purpose beyond our own. We protect these people, and find ways to strengthen them as much as we can. However, what happens when those we loved are in danger and we are render useless? Imagine finding your child to have a disease where you, yourself, can give no assistance and there is no medicine through all your best efforts?
I’ve seen it happen in my life and I know it would happen to any man. You fall to your knees and ask God for understanding. Every atheist holds this hypocricy within themselves, no matter how avid they are against God, there is a situation COULD happen in your life that would bring you to your knees.
To love another more than yourself is all God seems to require. Direct that towards God’s son, then He promises a peace that passes understanding for eternity. It isn’t a concept that deserves any ridicule, and shame on anyone who does so.
“You fall to your knees and ask God for understanding. Every atheist holds this hypocricy within themselves, no matter how avid they are against God, there is a situation COULD happen in your life that would bring you to your knees. ” It’s true that even atheists will exclaim “Oh, God!” and pray to God in a foxhole…but that doesn’t imply hyprocrisy; superstition has a very strong hold on humanity—it seems to be built into us—and it is only natural to want to believe in something higher when the chips are down, because it’s a lot easier than believing shit happens for no reason.
so someone who doesn’t believe in god, but prays to God isn’t being a hypocrit?
I disagree.
It’s very common that a Christian is called hypocritical because he drinks too much, curses, ect, ect.
Because drinking, cursing, et cetera are against Christian beliefs.
An atheist praying to God when the s**t hits the fan, however, isn’t hypocrisy. Under stressful situations, people will believe anything if it promises to get them out of said situation, and most often, that is God.
It’s kind of similar to people running from an explosion. They think running away to safety is going to help them, so they do so.
funny how unfair that is!? Christ comes to say everyone is forgiven and to love and accept everyone, but someone who follows His lead gets drunk out of stress and is cast as a hypocrit….
then there’s an atheist who dismisses or curses God on his knees praying to Him….. but he’s just being Human.
Do you see the problem with this common bias towards good, Christian followers?
As for your explosion example….it would only be similar to if everyone running away believed “i’m firmly against running from explosions”
I think this is taking it a bit far for a text message slip haha. Either way its hilarious.
“Every atheist holds this hypocricy within themselves, no matter how avid they are against God, there is a situation COULD happen in your life that would bring you to your knees. ”
I’m sorry, but your words are either ignorant or lies. I am an atheist and I hold no ‘hypocricy’ (hypocrisy) in terms of a god.
Whilst I am an atheist, I would never ever ever pray to your god (NOTHING could ‘bring me to my knees’), simply because I *don’t* believe in a god. All atheists I know would say the same thing. Why would someone who doesn’t believe pray? This makes no sense whatsoever.
Yes, there is a possibility I might one day believe in some sort of god, if evidence was presented to me…just like it it COULD happen that in a Christian’s life, they turn away from their god. It’s just HIGHLY improbable for me, and it definitely wouldn’t be brought on by any of the situations you outlined. It would be brought on by reason and logic.
By the way, by definition, the point at which your imaginary ‘atheist’ prays, means they aren’t an atheist any more.
If I had a penny for every time I heard a Christian say all atheists secretly believe…Nonesense.
/rant
oops *nonsense
you litterally butchersed my entire point in order to supply your own.
I am sorry for your feel a candid bitterness towards believers. For that I’m sure you have some solid justifications, however my point was this:
If you find a way to love another more than yourself (which God seems to believe is your purpose in life) and then you are rendered helpless to help or assist that person, then you, or any other man for that matter, will seek God in despiration.
zombievictim also made a good point in that “there is no athiest in a fox hole” but that’s not exactly what I’m trying to get across. Not every man has the oportunity to fight for a cause, but every man has the oportunity to love another more dearly than themselves……and in that love God seems to show himself to even the staunchest of nonbelievers.
I think I understand what you are saying, and I am saying you are wrong.
‘you, or any other man for that matter, will seek God in despiration’
Wrong. I love plenty of other people more than myself, and I do not (and would not) seek a god ‘in desperation’, any more than millions of other atheists would. You specifically brought up atheists, and so I am telling you, as one, that you are mistaken. If you had said that only Christians seek God in desperation, I wouldn’t have replied. That is not what you said. You said ‘any man’ and ‘atheists’.
Actually ‘no atheists in foxholes’ is a rotten point, not a good one, because like I said, atheists aren’t pretending not to believe, they simply don’t.
For e.g., a family member of mine died yesterday, but I am not suddenly praying for his soul or hoping he is in Heaven, because I know that’s pointless, and he isn’t.
I have re-read your original post and the only possible thing I can think of that would make me mistaken, is if the second time you used ‘to your knees’ you meant it differently…did you?
The ‘any man’ is still incorrect though.
Please let me know if English is not your first language, as it may account for this apparent misunderstanding.
you definately have a fortitude holding your belief structure, but my point, as you have still evaded, is specific towards those who Love another more than themselves.
I am guessing that you have not experienced such since you have avoided the core of my point.
I have deducted that you have no child and perhaps no spouse. I also have deducted that you are young and have not served in any form of military.
As your time elapses your view of God will soften as you learn to Love others more than yourself.
Perhaps this won’t happen, and you will remain alone. Your shunning of God may become your very pinacle of existance……it may be the only banner you ever wave, like Mr. Dawkins…..but as your age ripens and you feel your calendar days growing thin, you will begin to realize the meaninglessness of your existance grown greater and greater and you, stanger, will seek to find some peace with the mystery concept that is God.
me: ‘I love plenty of other people more than myself’
you: ‘my point, as you have still evaded, is specific towards those who Love another more than themselves.’
Nice comprehension skills.
Guess away. You have no idea how arrogant you sound (or perhaps you do..?).
i’m sorry for the arrogance. I suppose it’s hard to strike any tone but arrogance when trying to be knowledgable on a blog. I’ve found out quite a bit from you on this little blog though, Poggy.
Perhaps you do have many peopel that you love beyond your own self.
Love, like God, cannot be felt unless you put faith into it. THere are many people in this world that believe the concept of Love is a farce, and you would be well suited to tell them that they are incorrect. I, like you to them, am saying that God is Love, and will absolutely show himself to any man if they are helpless to protect one that they Love more than themselves.
‘I’ve found out quite a bit from you on this little blog though, Poggy’.
I doubt you have, as I mostly lurk, and unlike you, I don’t presume to generalise about what other people believe, how they love, or their stations in life.
‘but as your age ripens and you feel your calendar days growing thin, you will begin to realize the meaninglessness of your existance grown greater and greater and you, stanger, will seek to find some peace with the mystery concept that is God.’
I actually laughed when I read that. That is you speaking out of fear of death. You may think you need some higher power to make your life meaningful, but I don’t, so I’ll thank you not to preach at me.
‘I, like you to them, am saying that God is Love, and will absolutely show himself to any man if they are helpless to protect one that they Love more than themselves.’
So, are you suggesting that anyone who currently doesn’t believe in a god, yet has been through a situation like this and had a loved one die because they were helpless to protect them, must have not loved them enough in the first place? Your arrogance disgusts me.
mockery, sarcasm, names such as “ignorance” and “discusts me” and “arrogance”
As you think I am preesuming about people, I am writing as a traveler who has aged with experience and witness. I’ve walked with people of all kinds and experienced most any feeling a man can go through. If you find yourself wondering from time to time as to why your never satisfied, then consider trying to respect your fellow man. There is a whole world of experience far beyond your understanding of feelings. It is my prayer that life takes you far, through old age, and you can experience much everything that this world has to offer.
“The open-minded see the truth in different things: the narrow-minded see only the differences.”
I don’t think you are presuming…you are. You’ve variously said that (paraphasing):
Any man will turn to god in a time of need
Atheists all have hyprocrisy within themselves
I am young
I am probably unmarried
I have never been in the military
If you love someone other than yourself you will know God when they are in great need
When I grow older I will realise my life is meaningless
I perhaps am never satisfied
I don’t respect my fellow man
None of the above follows from any evidence or logical reasoning. I don’t care where you’ve gone or how old you are, it doesn’t mean you know diddly squat about me, or atheists, for that matter, as demonstrated by your posts. You may be old, but you do not seem wise, only comfortable and conceited in your beliefs.
The fact that you have continued to push your point that ‘God is Love, and will absolutely show himself to any man if they are helpless to protect one that they Love more than themselves.’, with no evidence or logic, and refused to even acknowledge my rebuttal (except for your last post where you dropped your point entirely), makes me realise that it is impossible to have a reasoned discourse with you.
I would thank you for your prayer, except that prayers don’t generally seem to get anything done.
I will now bid you adieu, as I have work to finish and this conversation is pointless.
the Psychology of associations a deductions bears much logic, but they are, as you said, presuptions.
If it not true that you are young, unmarried, have no children, and have served in no military service, then you are an outlier of what you seem to represent yourself as. I presume that I am true in these estimates.
As for the predictions of how God presents himself to people, those are not presumptions. They are absolutely logical and reasonable, as you see, my friend, most the world does believe in God, and at that most cast thier faith in Christ. That is what experience and open-minded involvement with people show.
Your hatred towards God seems to have closed your mind, and in that my prayer still stands.
i’ll leave you with this, Poggy, as i know you’ll read it.
I’m sorry for your loss of your family member yesterday. Have you spent a long time meaninglessly arguing about the existance of God and eternity with me. Have you spent equal time with any of your family member to help them mourning? Have you spoken as strongly to your loved ones about your family member’s life to them as you speak to me against me and my God? Or have you kept yourself aside mostly, and supported only in presence alone. If you find it easier to cast your will against those who find faith than you can to support those who you love in mourning, then you need to do some soul searching.
“The open-minded see the truth in different things: the narrow-minded see only the differences.”
The problem I see with this whole argument over religion is if you’re Christian I don’t remember Jesus saying
spread the word and those that don’t receive argue with them or keep pressing the issue so that they can receive or believe. He simply said spread the word if they don’t believe dust your feet and move on!! Yes, I am Christian and Punisher, I don’t agree with your method used here, but to each their own. But I don’t see the point in convincing people how mighty Jesus is when clearly it’s stated in the bible that not everyone will believe.
And as far as the persecution of Christians, it wasn’t done at the hands of aetheists, it was committed by the hands of other religious sects. Aethists people tend to care less about Christians and others with religion because they don’t believe in a god. Don’t confuse aethists with satanists and alot of your posts appear to be using the words interchangeable.
Okie Dokie,
You are 100% right on paragraph 1. I wish i could delete all these stupid comments. As i read through them again i can see a strong tone of arrogance and a huge lack of temperance.
I feel you are incorrect on paragraph 2. If God is not, that anything is permitted. I don’t think Athiest are satanists, as my father, whom i love more than any other man, is one, however but I would never feel comfortable with an Athiest in a leadership position. The last century we’ve endured countless genocides through men we are Athiests or surround themselves with Athiests as council. If my father ran for local government, I would not vote for him.
Exuse me, but Poggy said E.G before saying her family member died, which means EXAMPLE, so no, she is not mourning, she is using an example.
Also, athiests know that this life is the only one you have got, so they, according to your theory, should be sadder when a loved one dies.
I respect your belief, but you are attacking mine. or rather, my non-belief.
even if my little brother were on his death bed(shudder) i would not suddenly believe in god, i would be horribly sad because i would know i would never see him again. believing in fairies to make me feel better, is not a path i would take. accepting death, not ignoring it, but accepting it is the choice i make.
if i had a child like that, id just put him in a bag and throw him in the river
Holy sh*t, i think we should introduce twitter rules here, like a 140 letters limit…
Excellent…spread the mindlessness!
I’m an agnostic. When bad things happen for no good reason, I’m inclined to think that there is a God – and that God is playing with us the way a cruel child pulls the legs off a beetle.
There may be a God, but God isn’t necessarily good or loving. God could be a cruel tyrant utterly undeserving of our worship. Oddly, I seldom see this possibility mentioned.
It puzzles me when people assume that seeing bad things happen to people they love will make people more religious; I would think it would be evidence of the “problem of evil” (i.e. if God exists and is good, why is there evil in the world?). If I had a child who was dying, I’d be likely either to become an atheist or to curse God for allowing this to happen. (And, to religious folks who don’t understand the difference between the two, there is one.)
Take a walk into an All Children’s Hospital and observe the parents of these children. Then walk into the Ronald McDonald house, a living facility to accomidate these parents, all have a journal in each room as an outreach (to let others know others hva been down that path).
Almost the entire book is filled with pain, sorrow, hurt, and….God?? Oddly enough people are giving thanks for the situation they are in, and begging whoever reads it to put thier trust and faith in God. To find purpose through the turmoil, and to believe that the anguish and agony that you feel will be upheld and made purposeful through the eyes of God.
Thank you, O Heavenly Father, for blessing my child with terminal diseases and heart defects. I just know that I will be a better person after watching my infant die a horrible, painful death and will not spiral into depression.
I love you.
“True Spiritual belief can be irrational.”
that’s a good thing, is it? hey, let’s all embrace irrationality and see if we can make it coëxist with absolute rationality, because that should work out SO well!
nope. I believe I have Rational Spiritual belief, which is a good thing.
To me irrational spiritual believe would be a faith healer or someone who believes that they know someone who speaks directly to god.
I do not understand the rules of your fantasy universe. This book would never get published with such a vague and shifting premise.
i will not answer but this guy will =)
Good old bitter Hitchens, my favorite self-proclaimed atheist. I find it interesting that Jesus’ message isn’t mentioned nor the 100 million people slaughtered in the last CENTURY by anti-theistic regimes.
Man can use whatever it wants, including religion, to instill power and corrupt. Christ and the message He brought teaches how to remove yourself from such contol.
please stop preaching, you’re wrong and no one cares.
i thank you a lot!
Yep. This really is the place to argue about religion.
These websites are totally the 21st century Salon.
Self-owned!
His problem is that he’s an iPhail user. Lol
this is suprisingly easy to do with a iphone as it opens the last text convo you had. this, if you arent paying attention then you can quite easily text the wrong person.
Well, if he’s Catholic, he might just get his wish anyway.
All he has to do is join a church and get really involved with altar-boys
i’m not catholic, but I am informed enough to know that the actions of a couple of people hardly speak for the 6.7 billion other catholics in the world.
I know, I know, South Park can be halarious, but don’t replicate its jokes, it always spawns ignorance unless it comes from animated 2nd graders.
incept foot in mouth
2.2 billion catholics.
‘a couple ov people’? really? where have you been for the past 10+ years? it’s far more than a couple ov people. this isn’t exactly an isolated proble, it’s a widespread cancer in the church.
I really have to disagree with you on that. That type of thing is NOT just a Catholic problem. There are so many pedophiles and child abusers out there who are not Catholic. It’s clearly a societal problem, not just a problem in one church. A few Catholic priests (and it really is just a few, considering how many Catholics) do not speak for an entire church.
Societal problem…a very queer societal problem that occurs with most frequency among Catholic priests.
I think the reason it’s focused upon so much is the hypocrisy aspect–religious leaders harming the innocents they are supposed to lead. There are many pedophiles out there, but these pedophiles were supposedly approved to provide moral and religious guidance by a particular institution.
Yeah, because being a mindless sheep and following your church doesn’t spawn ignorance at all.
This reminds me of when I used to smoke weed. My hookups name was Dan, but I saved him under a different name so I wouldn’t accidentally text my Dad for marijuana.
that s**t does funny things to your mind
Black people, you make me laugh.
the religious right?
And thus, Mama’s point is proved.
seems a bit fake..?
thought so too tbh.. but i know one thing.. my parents wouldnt react like that.. they would just ignore it completely
This is so fake …
It’s a personal conversation. Who would take the screenshot (wierd son or bad mother if so)
this is so great it made me vomit with joy!
Awkward
you guys are on the internet, but i’m on the internet AND getting a blowjob at the same time!
More Awkward
Seems kinda fake to me. :/
so basically what i’m getting from the people saying they want to see real failbook posts is that you live on other peoples mistakes and humiliating situations…so you all fail because you’re all asses. i agree it’s funny but it’s not like i want it to actually happen to somebody
So Mama wants him to trade oral sex for a circle jerk?
Momma’s response should be a WIN!
*Nobody “needs Jesus” you retarded inbred bint
Apparently you do…
clearly fake as its probley two black people having that convo, and lets face it, two black people cant afford two iphones
Racism fail.
ooohhh my gosh lamest of the fake.
Fake and gay.
Church belongs in the dark ages.
Honestly, would that even work for a good sext?
yeeeah this seems pretty fake. The whole “Mama I love you” thing doesn’t make it quite believable.
Please don’t put obvious fakes that aren’t even in FB format up on Failbook.
Yawn. All that’s needed is a “my friends sent that, sorry” lie and it’s over with. Assuming it’s real of coarse.
Ironically, being too strict on your kids will often have the opposite effect. So I’d have to say.. no you DID raise him like that.
Silly boy. You’re supposed to say “Oh, I’m so sorry mama. I didn’t write that, someone hacked my account.”
This is Go Tell It On The Mountain, if it were written in 2010
mega epic lulz ftw mudkips seaking obvious troll is obviously over 9000
its probably fake it looks planned out i mean who the f**k says mama these days like 30 year old babies
30 year old babies?
Benjamin Button, perhaps?
you sir, are a jerk.
there is nothing wrong with calling his mother mama
for all you know it could be native to his culture, if he is not american, and if this were not fake.
I’m 13 and i call my mum “mummy”sometimes.
please, maturity is not judged by what you call your mummy.
He doesnt need Jesus. He needs Head, didnt she read the the effing message?
is’nt this double fail?
f**kin trollers… on failblog, if this comments would be on Artoftrolling this would be a win. Also god doesn’t exists get over it christian f**ktards
HAHAHAHA Tiger Woods sent the wrong text to his mum!
This sounds so fake.
so how did mama (and all the other people posting iphone chats) get that pixel perfect screencap off their phone?
Hold down the lock and home button. It takes a screenshot.
fake
I love the internet.
Yes, he needs the Jesus zombie in his life.
:3 Hi.
Parent ownage ftw.
Oh S**T!!!