They still use a lower case g in almost all references, mainly because it’s polytheistic and they aren’t using it as a name. Now if you’re saying your name is God, well then by all means, please, go ahead! The people of the internet aren’t the ones you’ll have to answer to :-p
Maybe I did.
Maybe I was subtlely mocking the unnecessary capitalization I was referring to in my (as Mack thankfully grasped) sarcastic post.
Maybe I was being wilfully offensive.
Maybe I don’t share your contention that a capitalized God refers exclusively to the deity of Christian worship.
Who knows?
~~:IT’S A MYSTERY:~~
Actually I did spend a few moments deliberating whether to go with the ‘g’ or ‘G’ before posting. I’m pleased with my choice.
No, I got that, but in going with Failbooking’s implication that it means the teacher is having sex with students, it WOULD be worse if it were homeschool. By the same token, a teacher could be having sex with, say, another teacher at school. It just wouldn’t be funny that way.
It’s funny that we have got to a point in life where where we see an article about a teacher having sex with a student, we automatically think it’s a female teacher. Well, at least it’s another area were women are considered equals to men. Nice that they are considered equals when it comes to molesting minors.
…and it shouldn’t need pointing out, but adults work in schools. This chap/chapette may very well be referring to intercourse with one of his/her colleagues. I am aware that there is an intimation in the failbook submission that suggests otherwise, and that therein lies teh funneh (because child molestation is always teh funneh, right?), but still…
totally agree, seems people always jump to the negative conclusion on such statements.
(people, look at a classic example ((I understand it is only a cartoon but has many valid points on modern society)) Skinner and Krabappel!)
also if people seem to understand some comments are meant as sarcasm, then why not take the post as sarcastic, for all we know this facebook user may not be a teacher and is trying to get a cheap laugh or heated debate amoung naïve commentors.
Wouldn’t it still be a bit disturbing if it was with another teacher? It’s SCHOOL. There are chiiildren. Unless it’s a high school, in which case do what you will LOL
BAHAHAHAHAHA!
I think the phrase “do what you love to do” is taken too far…
I wonder who it is….
Second – wow, thats just wooooo!!!
anyway, if my teacher did that, id totally laugh
=-O
The title is a fail…
agree
Failbooker banged his English teacher for his grade instead of studying?
I had an English teacher who’d sleep with a new boy every year. So it is possible.
‘was thinking the same, actually.
So that’s how we identify which teacher will sleep with us
was thinking the same thing +1
failbooking fail
oh shiiiiiiii–
I <3 trolls.
get outta here troll-monger
xD
fail
*Kids. No need for an apostrophe there.
Could you please learn how to properly use apostrophes?
Hello Miss Donald
Title fail … it’s KIDS, not KID’S
You’re assuming the writer doesn’t want to look like an idiot.
Classic rookie error.
Also: ‘With’ didn’t need a capital ‘I’. Grammar policing is so satisfying. I am clearly a God among men.
@Britpunk, It’s “God”. Use logic, not incompetence to judge your life.
If you’re _a_ god, it’s a lower case g, just so you know.
Hey I’m the God around here; I can captalize it however I Goddamn choose.
I’m a goD.
… Well, I guess I can give you that. God knows that grammar isn’t religion’s strong suit.
I’m an Olympian, baby!
Olympian FTW
They still use a lower case g in almost all references, mainly because it’s polytheistic and they aren’t using it as a name. Now if you’re saying your name is God, well then by all means, please, go ahead! The people of the internet aren’t the ones you’ll have to answer to :-p
See, this is why we need a sarcasm font. Apparently some people miss it.
We love looking like idiots.
It’s the internet, so how can we avoid it?
I’m surprised they haven’t quietly changed it by now
Shh… Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
@Britpunk, I’m assuming you mean “a god among men”, as God with a capital G refers solely to the Christian deity.
Maybe I did.
Maybe I was subtlely mocking the unnecessary capitalization I was referring to in my (as Mack thankfully grasped) sarcastic post.
Maybe I was being wilfully offensive.
Maybe I don’t share your contention that a capitalized God refers exclusively to the deity of Christian worship.
Who knows?
~~:IT’S A MYSTERY:~~
Actually I did spend a few moments deliberating whether to go with the ‘g’ or ‘G’ before posting. I’m pleased with my choice.
I think this guy works at my school. aha
That’s my teacher…
Hopefully a homeschooler – then it’s a win. Else… well… the kids in that school SHOULD homeschool. Good grief.
I think it’s even WORSE if it’s homeschool…
Bingo.
No, I got that, but in going with Failbooking’s implication that it means the teacher is having sex with students, it WOULD be worse if it were homeschool. By the same token, a teacher could be having sex with, say, another teacher at school. It just wouldn’t be funny that way.
It’s funny that we have got to a point in life where where we see an article about a teacher having sex with a student, we automatically think it’s a female teacher. Well, at least it’s another area were women are considered equals to men. Nice that they are considered equals when it comes to molesting minors.
… Who’s assuming it’s a female? One commenter said it was a “Miss Donald” sure, but another commentor implied that it was a male teacher.
…and it shouldn’t need pointing out, but adults work in schools. This chap/chapette may very well be referring to intercourse with one of his/her colleagues. I am aware that there is an intimation in the failbook submission that suggests otherwise, and that therein lies teh funneh (because child molestation is always teh funneh, right?), but still…
Meh, sorry – I should’ve refreshed before posting. Glad to know someone else feels the same.
totally agree, seems people always jump to the negative conclusion on such statements.
(people, look at a classic example ((I understand it is only a cartoon but has many valid points on modern society)) Skinner and Krabappel!)
also if people seem to understand some comments are meant as sarcasm, then why not take the post as sarcastic, for all we know this facebook user may not be a teacher and is trying to get a cheap laugh or heated debate amoung naïve commentors.
“Mrs. Krabappel and Principal Skinner were in the closet and they were making babies and I saw one of the babies and then the baby looked at me.”
The baby looked at you?!
That, and it’s also sad that people assume that it’s with a kid instead of another teacher.
Wouldn’t it still be a bit disturbing if it was with another teacher? It’s SCHOOL. There are chiiildren. Unless it’s a high school, in which case do what you will LOL
BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! *gasp* BAhAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA* *giggles*
Wow. Just… wow.
i think the term ‘pedophile’ comes to mind when i read something like this. does anyone else think the same?
pedo comes to mind when I hear that a sub is coming to my class
Would that be a 6- or 12-inch sub?
LOL nice!!!
No.
Honestly, Britpunkt owns @ trollin.
I bi worshippin u mon.
Oh fan button how i miss thee
http://xkcd.com/463/
AHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAAHHAHAH
sunday school teacher?
Wow, you can’t make this stuff up.
cadieux!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
facepalm so big I have to…
……………………………………..________
………………………………,.-’”……………….“~.,
………………………..,.-”……………………………..”-.,
…………………….,/………………………………………..”:,
…………………,?………………………………………………\,
………………./…………………………………………………..,}
……………../………………………………………………,:`^`..}
……………/……………………………………………,:”………/
…………..?…..__…………………………………..:`………../
…………./__.(…..”~-,_…………………………,:`………./
………../(_….”~,_……..”~,_………………..,:`…….._/
……….{.._$;_……”=,_…….”-,_…….,.-~-,},.~”;/….}
………..((…..*~_…….”=-._……”;,,./`…./”…………../
…,,,___.\`~,……”~.,………………..`…..}…………../
…………(….`=-,,…….`……………………(……;_,,-”
…………/.`~,……`-………………………….\……/\
………….\`~.*-,……………………………….|,./…..\,__
,,_……….}.>-._\……………………………..|…………..`=~-,
…..`=~-,_\_……`\,……………………………\
……………….`=~-,,.\,………………………….\
…………………………..`:,,………………………`\…………..__
……………………………….`=-,……………….,%`>–==“
…………………………………._\……….._,-%…….`\
……………………………..,<`.._|_,-&“…………….`
Copied from some one else, FYI