This looks like the type of thing where someone might intentionally use a homonym to change the meaning. We *know* “horrible” should be there, but “whorable” changes the meaning enough to make it a pun (or something pun-like, at least) and not as much of a cliche. I’m not explaining myself well here, but consider that it’s more of a humor fail than a spelling/ grammar fail.
Out of curiosity, is that supposed to be a reference to the children’s book “Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No-good, Very Bad Day”? I think I read that in elementary school…
YES! That’s the first thing I thought of when I read this post… well, I thought “I KNOW that’s from a children’s book I loved when I was a little kid, but I can’t remember which one!” Thanks for putting the title.
It is a reference to that kid’s book, she has two children. But she didn’t spell it that way on purpose, she just has really bad spelling. Her current status is “Its sad we have to rely so much on Tecnology.”
HAHAAHAHAAH. whoreeee
FIRST!
Fail^
In the land where coma’s don’t exist every day you can be easily turned into a whore.
you’re an idiot.
Actually a land without comas would be pretty nice. A world without commas would be pretty messed up though.
ahahahahaha epic win
God, you’re a douche.
True. I would hate a world without commas, but a world without comas would be epic! LOL!
And a world without misplaced apostrophes would be even better!
And a world where people didn’t spell “definitely” with an “a” or say something is hysterical when they mean hilarious would also be nice.
This is probably actually a reference to a whitest kid you know sketch
how whorable, its whoreiffic – i’ll play here a prostitune on my whoremoniaka
spelling is bad but you get the gist
^ Agreed. Some “fails”need to be checked out.
It also seems to be a double reference, because I’ve heard someone “no good, very bad day” used. I want to say a children’s book?
Correct, it is Alexander and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day
This looks like the type of thing where someone might intentionally use a homonym to change the meaning. We *know* “horrible” should be there, but “whorable” changes the meaning enough to make it a pun (or something pun-like, at least) and not as much of a cliche. I’m not explaining myself well here, but consider that it’s more of a humor fail than a spelling/ grammar fail.
WHORE!! Haha XD
Out of curiosity, is that supposed to be a reference to the children’s book “Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No-good, Very Bad Day”? I think I read that in elementary school…
YES! That’s the first thing I thought of when I read this post… well, I thought “I KNOW that’s from a children’s book I loved when I was a little kid, but I can’t remember which one!” Thanks for putting the title.
It is a reference to that kid’s book, she has two children. But she didn’t spell it that way on purpose, she just has really bad spelling. Her current status is “Its sad we have to rely so much on Tecnology.”
haha I thought of that too